Fourier Transform Homework: Solving P(t) with E(t_1) & E(t_2)

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi

I wish to Fourier transform the following expression

<br /> P(t) = \int\limits_{ - \infty }^\infty {dt_1 dt_2 \chi (t - t_1 ,t - t_2 )E(t_1 )E(t_2 )} <br />

What I do is the following

<br /> \int\limits_{ - \infty }^\infty {P(\omega )e^{ - i\omega t} } = \int\limits_{ - \infty }^\infty {dt_1 dt_2 d\omega _1 d\omega _2 \,\chi (\omega _1 ,\omega _2 )E(\omega _1 )E(\omega _2 )e^{ - i\omega _1 (t - t_1 )} e^{ - i\omega _2 (t - t_2 )} e^{ - i\omega _1 t_1 } e^{ - i\omega _2 t_2 } } <br />

I'm pretty sure I need to keep rewriting the expressions on the LHS and RHS until I reach a point, where I can compare the terms to each other. But do you have a hint for what I need to do from here?

Cheers,
Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, so what we have is

<br /> \int\limits_{ - \infty }^\infty {d\omega P(\omega )e^{ - i\omega t} } = \int\limits_{ - \infty }^\infty {dt_1 dt_2 d\omega _1 d\omega _2 \,\chi (\omega _1 ,\omega _2 )E(\omega _1 )E(\omega _2 )e^{ - i\omega _1 (t - t_1 )} e^{ - i\omega _2 (t - t_2 )} e^{ - i\omega _1 t_1 } e^{ - i\omega _2 t_2 } } <br />
<br /> \int\limits_{ - \infty }^\infty {d\omega P(\omega )e^{ - i\omega t} } = \int\limits_{ - \infty }^\infty {dt_1 dt_2 d\omega _1 d\omega _2 \,\chi (\omega _1 ,\omega _2 )E(\omega _1 )E(\omega _2 )e^{ - i\omega _1 t} e^{ - i\omega _2 t}} <br />

But this seems a little odd, because what am I supposed to do about the integral over t1 and t2?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top