Fourier transform of an assumed solution to a propagating wave

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the Fourier transform of a propagating wave represented by ψ(x,z,t) and its time-shifted version P(x,z,t-τ). The initial assumption is that the wave can be expressed as ψ = Q*exp[-i(kx)], where k is the wavenumber. The participant believes they have successfully transformed the shifted wave into the frequency domain using the property of Fourier transforms, resulting in FT[P(x,z,t-τ)] = Q(x,z,ω)*exp[-i(kx - ωτ)]. However, their teacher argues that this expression does not necessarily indicate a complete transformation into the Fourier domain, suggesting that it may still represent a spatial-time domain wave. The participant seeks clarification on this confusion regarding the transformation process.
erba
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
We have a wave ψ(x,z,t). At t = 0 we can assume the wave to have the solution (and shape)

ψ = Q*exp[-i(kx)]
where k = wavenumber, i = complex number

The property for a Fourier transform of a time shift (t-τ) is

FT[f(t-τ)] = f(ω)*exp[-i(ωτ)]

Now, assume ψ(x,z,t) is shifted in time. Thus, ψ(x,z,t) = P(x,z,t-τ). And I want to express the shifted version of ψ (i.e. P) in the frequency domain. Me myself think this is done as:

FT[P(x,z,t-τ)] = Q(x,z,ω)*exp[-i(kx)]*exp[-i(ωτ)] = Q(x,z,ω)*exp[-i(kx - ωτ)]

Though, my teacher claims that, when we assume the solution to be Q(x,z,ω)*exp[-i(kx - ωτ)], we have not necessarily transformed the it into the Fourier domain yet. He says that this solution can be given to a wave in the spatial-time domain as well.
I claim, and think that we have transformed it! But, I guess that my teacher is right and I am wrong.

So please, could you guide me through my confusion here?

PS. Hope the explanation of my question is good enough. Otherwise, ask me :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
erba said:
Now, assume ψ(x,z,t) is shifted in time. Thus, ψ(x,z,t) = P(x,z,t-τ). And I want to express the shifted version of ψ (i.e. P) in the frequency domain. Me myself think this is done as:

FT[P(x,z,t-τ)] = Q(x,z,ω)*exp[-i(kx)]*exp[-i(ωτ)] = Q(x,z,ω)*exp[-i(kx - ωτ)]

Hey! Correct me if I am wrong but you are trying to get the Fourier transform of ψ(x,z,t-T)? but you solved for ψ(x,z,t-T), where t=0, or ψ(x,z,T). Or is that what you are trying to do?
 
Last edited:
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top