Fourier Transform of this function

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Fourier transform of a specific function, focusing on the steps taken to evaluate an integral involving exponentials. Participants explore various methods and reasoning related to integration techniques, specifically addressing the use of Taylor series and integration by parts.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the transition from one step to another in the integral evaluation, suggesting that integration by parts may have been used.
  • Others propose that the power series expansion of e^{-ikx} was utilized in the evaluation.
  • A participant argues against moving e^{-ikx} outside the integral due to its dependence on x, emphasizing that it cannot be factored out in that manner.
  • Another participant suggests that the integral could be more easily solved by completing the square rather than using the Taylor expansion.
  • There is a discussion about the appropriateness of the methods used, with some participants describing the approach taken as clumsy and suggesting alternative strategies for solving the integral.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of moving e^{-ikx} outside the integral and the methods used for evaluation. No consensus is reached regarding the best approach to solve the integral.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the integral and the potential limitations of the methods discussed, including the dependence on the Taylor series and the need for careful handling of terms when completing the square.

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13
Hi guys, I'm not sure how they got from first step to the second. Did they use integration by parts? I tried but I didn't arrive at the same result..



119ypag.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It appears the power series of e^{-ikx} was used.
 
MisterX said:
It appears the power series of e^{-ikx} was used.

I've thought about that, but the integral is the product of two exponentials, not produt of two integrals:

∫eA.eB dx = ∫ e(A+B) dx



∫eA dx ∫eB dx = [Ʃ(1/r!)Ar] ∫eB dx

I'm not sure why they simply moved the e-ikx out of the integral.
 
It's just the Taylor expansion of the exponential. BTW that's not the easiest way to solve that integral. Try completing the square.
 
unscientific said:
I'm not sure why they simply moved the e-ikx out of the integral.

You can't move it outside because of its dependence on x.
 
dauto said:
You can't move it outside because of its dependence on x.

My point exactly. So what magic did they perform at that step then?
 
They performed no magic :) Actually, that looks like a rather clumsy approach to solve that integral.

They did not bring exp(-ikx) outside the integral. They simply replaced exp(-ikx) with its Taylor expansion. What you want to bring outside the integral are just the Taylor coefficients of the xn terms.

By the way, as you have been suggested by dauto, try instead to complete the square inside the brackets and you'll solve that integral in no time (no Taylor expansion involved). Interpret the terms inside the brackets as:

A^2=\frac{x^2}{2a^2}

2AB= ikx

B^2= \, ?

Try to determine B^2 and then write your integrand as e-(A2 + 2AB + B2-B2) which is equal to e-(A+B)2 eB2

By the way, this thread would have fitted better in Mathematics/Calculus since your question is essentially about the evaluation of an integral.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K