Fourier Transform Real Function Wave Equation

VVS
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I hope somebody can help me with this.

1. Homework Statement

I am supposed to show that if there is a function \phi(x,t) which is real, satisfies a linear wave equation and which satisfies \phi(x,0)=0 for x<0 then the Fourier Transform \tilde{\phi}(k) of \phi(x,0) is in the lower complex plane.

Homework Equations


The Fourier Transform of \phi(x,0) is \tilde{\phi}(k)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int\phi(x,0)e^{-ikx}dx

The Attempt at a Solution


Basically my idea was to multiply \phi(x,0) by the Heaviside function, since that would make no difference and then take the Fourier Transform: \tilde{\phi}(k)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int\phi(x,0)u(x)e^{-ikx}dx. Then you can use the Convolution property and write: \tilde{\phi}(k)=\mathbb{F}(\phi(x,0))*\mathbb{F}(u(x))=\mathbb{F}(\phi(x,0))*\frac{1}{2}\left(\delta(k)+\frac{1}{ik}\right). Then you can use the linearity of the convolution and you obtain an integral equation:
\tilde{\phi}(k)=\tilde{\phi}(k)*\frac{1}{ik}
Then I can split \tilde{\phi}(k)=\tilde{\phi_{re}}(k)+i\tilde{\phi_{im}}(k)
So basically the real part is the imaginary part convolved and the imaginary part is the real part convolved.
Now I am stuck. Somehow if I can show that the real part is positive then it will always be in the lower complex plane.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 
Hey thanks for the reply.
We solved the problem in class so there is no more need for help.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top