Fraction of Hydrogen Atoms in First Excited State

burg25
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1. Homework Statement
The temperature of the surface of a certain star is 8000 K. Most hydrogen atoms at the surface of the star are in the electronic ground state. What is the approximate fraction of the hydrogen atoms that are in the first excited state (and therefore could emit a photon)? The energy of the first excited state above the ground state is (-13.6/22 eV) - (-13.6 eV) = 10.2 eV = 1.632e-18 J.

Homework Equations


Kb = 1.38e-23 J/K
1/T = E/Kb

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't really know how to do this problem. My guess was to divide the energy in joules by the temperature and then divide by the Boltzmann constant to make it unitless.

(1.632e-18/8000)/(1.38e-23)=14.8
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm... You are right so far, but you might want to use the Boltzmann factor for this problem as well.
 
What do you mean? Could you clarify?
 
Wait I think I understand. Are you saying take e raised to this value?
 
Yeah I got it. Thanks
 
Yes, using the Boltzmann factor you get:

\frac{P(E_1)}{P(E_0)} = e^{-\frac{E_1-E_0}{kT}}

where P(E) is the probability the electron is in the state with energy E.

Since a vast majority of the electrons are in the ground state, you can say P(E_0)\approx 1.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top