Fractional Calculus and the Riemann Zeta function

benorin
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,442
Reaction score
191
So it is well-known that for n=2,3,... the following equation holds

\zeta(n)=\int_{x_{n}=0}^{1}\int_{x_{n-1}=0}^{1}\cdot\cdot\cdot\int_{x_{1}=0}^{1}\left(\frac{1}{1-\prod_{k=1}^{n}x_{k}}\right)dx_{1}\cdot\cdot\cdot dx_{n-1}dx_{n}

My question is how can this relation be extended to n\in\mathbb{C}\setminus \{1\}, or some appreciable subset thereof (e.g. \Re(n)>1 using fractional integration?

My bad: meant to post this in the Calculus & Analysis forum.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe you could do it by the "dimensional regularization" method that the physicists use to eliminate cancelling infinities in QFT. The idea is that you write the RHS using a method that works for arbitrary dimensions.

For the problem at hand, you might begin by converting the limits of integration to go over the whole real line instead of from 0 to 1. Then convert to spherical coordinates and hopefully write it in a way that eliminates N from the number of integrals, for example, by integrating the angular part.

Do tell us how when you find out.

Carl
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top