Fracture and shear forces on a beam

itsalwysunny
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 20.0 meter long uniform beam weighing 820 N rests on walls A and B, as shown in the figure
a)Find the maximum weight of a person who can walk to the extreme end D without tipping the beam.

b)Find the force that the wall A exert on the beam when the person is standing at D.

c)Find the force that the wall B exert on the beam when the person is standing at D.

d)Find the force that the wall A exert on the beam when the person is standing at a point 2.0 meters to the right of B.

e)Find the force that the wall B exert on the beam when the person is standing at a point 2.0 meters to the right of B.

f)Find the force that the wall A exert on the beam when the person is standing 2.0meters to the right of A.

g)Find the force that the wall B exert on the beam when the person is standing 2.0meters to the right of A.


The Attempt at a Solution



i know that for the person to reach the far end of D without the beam tipping the weight of the man W_m has to equal the forces acting on the beam at the spot of the two supports. I know the sum of the forces is equal to zero so i tried working out the weight at each end multiplied by its corresponding x position and set it equal to zero in order to find the weight of the person but came out with the wrong solution. Any idea how to go about doing the problem?
 

Attachments

  • GIANCOLI.ch12.p69.jpg
    GIANCOLI.ch12.p69.jpg
    3.7 KB · Views: 494
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried torques? Total torque must be 0 if the beam is to balance.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top