B Frame Dragging: Q&A for Time Travelers

TheDoctor6000
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Moderator's note: offshoot from https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/what-is-frame-dragging.762986/

I am trying to understand time travel and i can understand Tipler Cylinders and the cosmic string theory that assist the possibility of time travel but I was looking at Frame dragging because that’s how CTC (closed time like curves) work but those equations have not been taught to me yet. If you could make sense of them to me in a simple and basic way so that a year seven student could understand that would be a great help.
Thankyou
TheDoctor6000
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
TheDoctor6000 said:
... those equations have not been taught to me yet. If you could make sense of them to me in a simple and basic way so that a year seven student could understand that would be a great help.
...

Most 7 year olds have not had algebra. Makes equations difficult to explain.

Pick an equation and list which parts you do understand. It is often easy to add missing information. Someone can also correct an error if there is one.
 
I will go with th weak fram dragging équation The things I don’t understand are,
What does the w mean
Am I dividing that answer to the w by top and bottom?
And what do those letters mean I know what the numbers are on the bottom of the fraction line (they are indices) but on the top I am confused.

It would be a great help if you could answer these
And sorry if my questions are tedious to answer. I am just very interested in the possibilities of time travel and how it works.
Thankyou
TheDoctor6000
 
TheDoctor6000 said:
...
Am I dividing that answer to the w by top and bottom?
And what do those letters mean I know what the numbers are on the bottom of the fraction line (they are indices) but on the top I am confused.
ω is the frame-drag rate in rad/s
ω is greek letter "omega". It is radians per second which equals 9.55 rpm. A lot of cars have a gauge that reads thousands of rpm. Multiply that number by around 100.

J is the angular momentum. I think it is the same as L if you disregard particle spin. Alina Zagitova does a beautiful demonstration of angular momentum in this video. at end of 2:57 she kicks and then pulls her arms and legs into her center in 2:58. In 2:59 she has arms out and leg fully extended for the landing and then hops and pulls everything in for the rotations in 3:00. They have a slow motion freeze frame image at 6:04. At 4:18 she is adds angular momentum by kicking in a diagonal camel spin. She then does a sit spin(4:22) and an I-spin(4:26) using that angular momentum. She gets a full 6 seconds of spin and chews up the ice because most of her mass is directly above the skate when her foot is above her head.
If you understand and can talk about figure skating you probably understand angular momentum good enough for any casual conversation or for science fiction writing. I do not have any experience traveling through time. My impression was that a person would already become molecular soup if they get close enough to a black hole for the difference to matter. If you hand wave spaghettification then you can hand wave the spin too. Just assume classical mechanics in science fiction unless it is convenient to do otherwise.

G is the gravitational constant.
 
Last edited:
Thank you so much I appreciate all your help but what about Tipler Cylinders even if theoretical they could still aid in the possibility of time travel?
:smile:
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Back
Top