Frame of reference and relativity.

AI Thread Summary
In the discussed scenario, the observer flying at 0.9c between two stars sees the explosions occur simultaneously due to the events being defined as simultaneous in their own frame of reference. The initial misunderstanding arose from conflating the stars' frame of reference with the observer's frame. While it seems intuitive that the light from the closer star would reach the observer first, relativity dictates that simultaneity is relative and can differ between observers in motion. The key takeaway is that events simultaneous in one frame may not be in another, highlighting the non-absolute nature of simultaneity in relativity. This clarification resolves the confusion regarding the observer's perception of the explosions.
bayan
Messages
202
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



You are flying your personal rocketcraft at 0.9c from Star A toward Star B. The distance between the stars, in the stars' reference frame, is 1.0 ly. Both stars happen to explode simultaneously in your reference frame at the instant you are exactly halfway between them.

The question asked of the aforementioned scenario is "Do you see the flashes simultaneously?"

Homework Equations



Conceptual question, no equations needed.

The Attempt at a Solution



I answered the question with a no, my reasons were, if the rocket is at midway in his frame of reference when both stars explode, (the light from star B would reach the rocket first as it is traveling towards star B, i.e at .9c the distance of 1ly would be reduced to .44ly the midway of which would be .22ly) however it turns out the answer is yes. My relativity lecturer had a same view (on a similar question, he stated that the flashes would be observed at same time).

Could someone explain explain why my answer was wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bayan said:

Homework Statement



You are flying your personal rocketcraft at 0.9c from Star A toward Star B. The distance between the stars, in the stars' reference frame, is 1.0 ly. Both stars happen to explode simultaneously in your reference frame at the instant you are exactly halfway between them.

The question asked of the aforementioned scenario is "Do you see the flashes simultaneously?"

Homework Equations



Conceptual question, no equations needed.

The Attempt at a Solution



I answered the question with a no, my reasons were, if the rocket is at midway in his frame of reference when both stars explode, (the light from star B would reach the rocket first as it is traveling towards star B,
That would be true if the stars exploded simultaneously in the stars' frame of reference.

If somebody not moving relative to the stars (i.e that observer shares the same reference frame as the stars) observes the stars explode simultaneously, then you (who is moving with respect to the stars at 0.9 c) would see (and observe) star B explode first. But that's not what the problem statement describes. The problem statement says that the stars explode simultaneously in your frame of reference (not the stars' frame of reference).
however it turns out the answer is yes. My relativity lecturer had a same view (on a similar question, he stated that the flashes would be observed at same time).

Could someone explain explain why my answer was wrong?
There is no such thing as absolute simultaneity in relativity. Events which are simultaneous in one frame of reference are not necessarily simultaneous in another frame. Not only does the time difference of events change depending on one's frame of reference, but also the spatial difference. This is true even for different inertial frames of reference, (different inertial frames in special relativity have different relative velocities, even though they are constant velocities).

In your inertial frame of reference, you are the one standing still. According to your frame of reference, the stars are the things that are moving at 0.9 C (star B is moving toward you and star A away from you). Now try the same thought process. :wink:
 
Last edited:
Thanks for your reply, I understand it now :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top