Free-fall Acceleration with Centrifugal Force

CoreyJKelly
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



From Taylor's "Classical Mechanics", problem 9.15:

On a certain planet, which is perfectly spherically symmetric, the free-fall acceleration has magnitude g = g_0 at the North Pole and g = \lambda g_0 at the equator (with 0 \leq \lambda \leq 1). Find g(\theta), the free-fall acceleration at colatitude \theta as a function of \theta.


Homework Equations



g = g_0 + (\Omega \times R) \times \Omega

The Attempt at a Solution



The north pole corresponds to a colatitude of 0 degrees, and the equator corresponds to 90 degrees. Using these values, and a trial-and-error approach, I arrived at the equation

g(\theta) = g_{0}(Sin(\theta) + \lambda Cos(\theta))

the book gives the following answer:

g(\theta) = g_{0}\sqrt{Sin^{2}(\theta) + \lambda^{2} Cos^{2}(\theta)}

And I'm not really sure where to start with this. The equation I've given is the only one given for free-fall acceleration, but I can't see any way to manipulate it into anything like this answer. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can compute g as a function of theta with g = g_0 + (\Omega \times R) \times \Omega

this is a vector equation and g_0 doesn't point in the same direction as (\Omega \times R) \times \Omega
Once you've done that you can find \Lambda by looking at what happens at the equator.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top