Free Fall Question: Find Height from Half-Distance Traveled

  • Thread starter Thread starter Speedking96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fall Free fall
AI Thread Summary
An object in free fall covers half its total height in the final second of its descent. The discussion focuses on calculating the total height using kinematic equations, particularly emphasizing the relationship between distance, time, and acceleration due to gravity. Participants suggest using time as a variable to derive the height algebraically rather than relying on trial and error. The conversation encourages exploring specific examples to better understand the necessary equations. Ultimately, a structured approach to the problem can lead to the correct height calculation.
Speedking96
Messages
104
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In the final second of its free fall, an object covers half the height of its total fall. From what height did it fall?

2. The attempt at a solution

I know that the velocity and acceleration at the final second must be enough for the object to cover half the height.

Distance traveled due to acceleration:

= (0.5)(9.81)(1^2) = 4.905 meters.

I understand that whatever the velocity is, it must be enough for the object to travel (h/2) - 4.905 meters. H being the total height.

However, this is where I am having trouble.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
it might make most sense to use fall time as the variable. if the total fall time was 2 seconds, how far would it have gone ... in the first sec, and in the second sec?
... is that half-way ?
ok, what if the total time was 3s? how far in the 1st part (2 s) , compared to the 2nd part (1s)?
 
lightgrav said:
it might make most sense to use fall time as the variable. if the total fall time was 2 seconds, how far would it have gone ... in the first sec, and in the second sec?
... is that half-way ?
ok, what if the total time was 3s? how far in the 1st part (2 s) , compared to the 2nd part (1s)?

So, it is basically trial and error?
 
no on the contrary you should try it by taking time as a variable.
 
you can do it algebraically, if you know what expressions to equate.
If you do a couple of particular examples, you will find out (ie, learn) what those expressions ought to be.
Try it! (I'm not sure you are using the entire distance formula)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top