Tracking a Falling Ball: Investigating Radius Over Time

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the behavior of a falling ball's radius as observed from a distance, specifically addressing how the radius appears to change over time. The equation of free fall, s = 1/2gt^2, is referenced to explain the relationship between time and the ball's position. Participants clarify that the radius does not physically decrease but rather that the visible angle subtended by the ball changes as it falls. The proposed formula, r(t) = r/(1/2gt^2 + x), is confirmed as a valid approximation for small radii when viewed from a significant distance. Overall, the conversation emphasizes understanding the visual perception of the ball's radius during free fall.
Numeriprimi
Messages
135
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We have got a ball of radius r, which is falling from the roof of the house. How is the radius r with respect to time? We are looking at the ball directly from above and ball is at the beginning of fall x from our eyes. Neglect air resistance.

Homework Equations


I'm not sure what to write here. So I think the nub is equation of free fall: s= 1/2gt^2 radius decreases quadratically

The Attempt at a Solution


So, I know equation: s= 1/2gt^2
I think the radius decreases quadratically, because t^2.
I must attributed the x (s from eyes before free fall)
And my equation: r(t)= r/(1/2gt^2 + x)

It is right? Thanks for help.

PS: Sorry for bad English, but I don't know better yet.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If r is the radius of the ball, I don't see any reason why it should decrease. Do you mean the visible angle for the observer?
If the initial distance of the ball is large compared to the radius of the ball, your r(t) is an approximation for that angle.

Hmm... the original problem statement would be interesting - with translated words maybe ;).
 
No, no... How changing the radius of sight of the observer, when ball is falling free fall.

Hmmm... You don't interesting what I think? :-( Describe better?
 
Hi Numeriprimi! :smile:
Numeriprimi said:
So, I know equation: s= 1/2gt^2
I think the radius decreases quadratically, because t^2.
I must attributed the x (s from eyes before free fall)
And my equation: r(t)= r/(1/2gt^2 + x)
mfb said:
… Do you mean the visible angle for the observer?
If the initial distance of the ball is large compared to the radius of the ball, your r(t) is an approximation for that angle.

i agree with mfb :smile:

you seem to mean (half) the angle subtended at the eye, and your formula for r(t) confirms that (correctly, for small r) :wink:
 
So... Is my formula well?
 
your formula is good :smile:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top