Free falling rotational motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the free-fall motion of a post being cut from its lowest point, leading to a circular trajectory. The main question is to determine the velocity of the upper part of the post when it hits the ground. The user initially applies the energetic method, suggesting a velocity equation of v = √(3gL) but seeks validation and proof of this result. The conversation emphasizes the conservation of mechanical energy, equating potential energy lost to kinetic energy gained during the fall. The focus remains on using principles of rotational dynamics and energy conservation to derive the correct velocity.
vabamyyr
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
There is a post with length L and it is being cut down from its lowest point. So the post starts a free fall with circular trajector. The question is that what is the v of upper part of post when it hits the ground?

I used energetic method and mvL= 0,5mv^2 plus or minus something...
i have a feeling that it might be mgL= \frac 1 2 mv^2 - \frac 1 2 mgL \Longrightarrow v=\sqrt{3gL}

but i don't know how to prove it? Can anyone help me?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's just conservation of mechanical energy, treating the falling post as being in pure rotation about the lowest point:
\Delta {PE} = - \Delta {KE}
mg\Delta h_{cm} = - 1/2 I \omega^2
... etc...
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top