Can the Free Particle Wave Equation Be Solved for Periodic Boundary Conditions?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the solvability of the free particle wave equation under periodic boundary conditions. It highlights that the wave function can be expressed as a superposition of plane waves, with the relationship between the wave function and its Fourier transform being crucial. The conversation explores the implications of assuming a small delta k, which allows g(k) to behave like a delta function. There is a query about the general case of solving the wave equation for a defined periodic interval, specifically from 0 to 2πL. The overall consensus emphasizes that while the wave function can take various forms, the specific wave equation dictates how it evolves over time based on the conditions applied.
sniffer
Messages
112
Reaction score
0
for a free particle, the wave equation is a superposition of plane waves,

\psi(x,0)= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g(k)\exp(ikx)dk
and
g(k)= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\psi(0,0)\exp(-ikx)dx

one is the Fourier transform of the other. some cases to solve this is when we assume a small delta k, so g(k) behaves like a pulse "delta" function.

is there any more general case we can solve this?

i have been thinking hard if we have definite periodic x, say from 0 up to 2\pi L, is it solvable?

what would be the (periodic) eigen energy function (if it is)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sniffer said:
for a free particle, the wave equation is a superposition of plane waves,

\psi(x,0)= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g(k)\exp(ikx)dk
and
g(k)= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\psi(0,0)\exp(-ikx)dx

one is the Fourier transform of the other. some cases to solve this is when we assume a small delta k, so g(k) behaves like a pulse "delta" function.

The above pair is, as you say, a Fourier transform pair. Any "nice" function can be written that way, so the above is not a "wave equation" or something, it is a general way of writing a function.
The quantum state of a single scalar particle is described by just such a nice function, called the wave function. At any time, it can be (almost) any function. However, what the wave equation (not written here) gives you, is how this wavefunction AT A CERTAIN TIME t0 will change into the wavefunction at another time t1. This equation will be different according to the situation at hand (free particle, particle in a potential...).

cheers,
Patrick.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top