Freefall-Type Question: Solving for Ball Catching and Building Length

  • Thread starter Thread starter Iceman2032
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two balls: one dropped from a building and another thrown downward after two seconds. The key challenge is determining if the second ball will catch the first and, if so, the minimum height of the building. Participants suggest setting the displacement equations for both balls equal to each other to find the time at which they meet. The original poster struggles with negative values in their calculations, leading to confusion about whether the balls can catch each other. Ultimately, the problem is resolved, indicating that the calculations were incorrect initially, and the minimum height of the building is suggested to be 180 meters.
Iceman2032
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I am really struggling with this question:

A ball is dropped from the top of a tall building. Exactly 2 seconds later, another ball is thrown downwards from the top of the same building at 25 m/s. Will the second ball catch the first ball? If so, what is the minimum length of the building? If not, what is their closest approach?

I do not need the full solution, just a hint. It seems that whatever I do gets to a dead end. From the 5 variables (d, t, initial v, final v, and acceleration) I only have 2 of them in both cases...initial velocity and acceleration (which is 10 m/ss...given) I have also sketched the graphs but I just don't get this question.

Any help is appericiated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IF the 2nd one catches the first, then they would have the same displacement, wouldn't they? set two equations for d equal to each other and solve for time. If you get a negative answer, then "it can't happen."
 
distance fallen in t seconds is x(t)= (g/2)t2+ v0t
where v0 is the initial velocity.
The "dropped" ball has initial velocity 0, the thrown ball has initial velocity 25 (I'm taking positive downward). Also, be careful about when t= 0 is. If you take t= 0 to be when the first ball is dropped, the time the second ball is falling is t-2. The second ball will catch up to the two when they both have the same "x" so set up the two formulas, set them equal, and solve for t.
 
Okay, I took your suggestions and came up with the calculations attached to this post.

First of all excuse the typos and all, I just noticed an 'is' needs to be an 'if'. Took me some time to convert my scribbles into a neat image.

Now as you can see I have ended up with a negactive value for x. Something tells me I'm doing something really wrong. I mean the value of x is supiciously small...and negative. According to the first reply, they should never catch.

Also in my answer sheet, the answer to this problem is indicated as: 180m

It doesn't say wether 180 is their closest approach or height of the building.

So can you please tell me what I am doing wrong? Am I even using the right formula?! And after I calculate x, where do I go from there?

I really get lost in these 'catch' problems...
 

Attachments

  • calculation.png
    calculation.png
    6.3 KB · Views: 490
Nevermind, problem solved :)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top