Frequency of Electron Transition from (n+1) to n State

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the frequency of electron transitions from the (n+1) state to the nth state, with various equations presented for calculating frequency. Participants explore how to apply the approximation for large n (n >> 1) to simplify calculations, emphasizing that small differences should not be neglected. A user initially struggles with calculations without a calculator, but eventually confirms that option (a) is correct. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding approximations in physics and the need to handle subtractions carefully to avoid errors. Ultimately, the participants clarify the method for solving the problem while reinforcing key concepts in atomic structure.
Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93

Homework Statement


When an electron makes a transition from (n+1) state to nth state, the frequency of emitted radiations is related to n according to (n>>1):
(a)v=\frac{2cRZ^2}{n^3}
(b)v=\frac{cRZ^2}{n^4}
(c)v=\frac{cRZ^2}{n^2}
(a)v=\frac{2cRZ^2}{n^2}

Homework Equations


\frac{1}{\lambda}=RZ^2(\frac{1}{n_1^2}-\frac{1}{n_2^2})

The Attempt at a Solution


Solving the above equation and substituting the values i get:-
v=cRZ^2(\frac{1}{n^2}-\frac{1}{(n+1)^2})

v=cRZ^2(\frac{2n+1}{n^2(n+1)^2})

Now i am stuck, what should i do next?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's always a good idea when you're having trouble with a math problem to check whether you've used all the information given. You haven't used n>>1.
 
pmsrw3 said:
It's always a good idea when you're having trouble with a math problem to check whether you've used all the information given. You haven't used n>>1.

I don't know how should i use n>>1? :confused:
 
Well, try an example. Substitute in a big n, 100 for instance, and see what you get. Check whether it's closer to a, b, c, or d. Then try to figure out why.
 
pmsrw3 said:
Well, try an example. Substitute in a big n, 100 for instance, and see what you get. Check whether it's closer to a, b, c, or d. Then try to figure out why.

That's a lot of calculation if i substitute n=100, and i am not able to solve it.
When i substitute n=100, i get:-
v=cRZ^2(\frac{201}{10000(10201)})
 
Pranav-Arora said:
if i substitute n=100, and i am not able to solve it.
When i substitute n=100, i get:-
v=cRZ^2(\frac{201}{10000(10201)})
There's nothing to solve! Just punch it into your calculator and see what you get. Or use http://www.google.com/landing/searchtips/#calculator". Then do the same for the four choices you're given.

That's a lot of calculation
No, that is not a lot of calculation. That's a small amount of easy calculations. You need to get used to calculating things if you're going to be taking science classes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
pmsrw3 said:
There's nothing to solve! Just punch it into your calculator and see what you get. Or use http://www.google.com/landing/searchtips/#calculator". Then do the same for the four choices you're given.

Sorry, i can't use a calculator, this question is from my exam paper and in the examination room we were not allowed to use a calculator, so any other way to solve it?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Are you in the exam room now? If so, you shouldn't be asking for help. If not, then you can use a calculator.
 
pmsrw3 said:
Are you in the exam room now? If so, you shouldn't be asking for help. If not, then you can use a calculator.

No, don't talk silly, how can i be in the examination room and post a question?
 
  • #10
So use a calculator.
 
  • #11
Ok i did it using a calculator, i get my answer to be (a) option.
 
  • #12
Good. Now see if you can figure out why it comes out so close. If it's not obvious, try a few other n's.
 
  • #13
I like Serena said:
Hi Pranav-Arora! :smile:

If n >> 1, you can neglect small amounts in additions.
So for instance, n + 1 ≈ n
In the example where you calculated with n=100, you should e.g. replace 201 by 200.

Can you do that in your expression?

Hi! :smile:
If i solve it as you said, i again get (a) option.
 
  • #14
But what's the correct method?
 
  • #15
My apologies pmsrw3, it was not my intention to interfere, so I deleted my post. :blushing:
 
  • #16
Pranav-Arora said:
But what's the correct method?
That's it. If you try a bunch of calculations, it should become obvious that when n is big, n is practically the same as n+1, and 2n is practically the same as 2n+1.
 
  • #17
pmsrw3 said:
That's it. If you try a bunch of calculations, it should become obvious that when n is big, n is practically the same as n+1, and 2n is practically the same as 2n+1.

Thank you so much, i got it! :smile:
 
  • #18
Well, there is a catch...
What happens if you apply this estimation rule to your equation?

Pranav-Arora said:
Solving the above equation and substituting the values i get:-
v=cRZ^2(\frac{1}{n^2}-\frac{1}{(n+1)^2})
 
  • #19
I like Serena said:
Well, there is a catch...
What happens if you apply this estimation rule to your equation?

It becomes zero.
 
  • #20
Any idea why?
And how you should handle it?
 
  • #21
I like Serena said:
Any idea why?
And how you should handle it?

No idea.
 
  • #22
Well, if you subtract 2 almost equal large quantities, the result is small but not zero.
This is something you can not neglect.
So (n+1) - n = 1 and this is not 0.

The trick is to eliminate subtractions, before you neglect stuff.
 
  • #23
I like Serena said:
Well, if you subtract 2 almost equal large quantities, the result is small but not zero.
This is something you can not neglect.
So (n+1) - n = 1 and this is not 0.

The trick is to eliminate subtractions, before you neglect stuff.

Thanks for clarification! :smile:
Can you please see to the thread "Atomic Structure Question" in "other Science".
tiny-tim replied that i should first find out the force, but i have never dealt with force in atomic structure. :confused:
 
Back
Top