Fresnel Lens - Solve for Lithography & Power

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculations involving a Fresnel lens for lithography and power. The initial formula used, M = (lambda*f)/r_n, yielded a magnification of 29.48 nm, which was verified as correct. However, the subsequent calculation for focal length using f = r^2/(n*lambda) resulted in a focal length of 390.625, leading to a power in diopters of 2.56x10^03, which the user feels is too small. The user expresses uncertainty about the calculations and seeks clarification on potential errors or incorrect expressions used. The thread highlights the complexities of optical calculations in lithography applications.
Schreiber__
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Fresnel lens Part 1: You would like to design a 25 mm diameter blazed Fresnel zone plate with a first-order power of +1.5 diopters. What is the lithography requirement (resolution required) for making this lens that is designed for 550 nm? Express your answer in units of 𝜇𝑚 to one decimal point.

Fresnel lens Part 2: What would the power of the first diffracted order of this lens be at wavelength of 400 nm? Express your answer in diopters to one decimal point.
Relevant Equations
M = lambda/NA = (lambda*f)/r_n -> Part 1
f = r^2/(n*lambda) -> Part 2
For the first part, I got correct:
M = (lambda*f)/r_n
Converting units to meters (m) then plugging them in:
(550x10^-9 m) * (0.67 m)/(0.0125 m) = 2.948x10^-5 or 29.48x10^-6 m or 29.48 nm
This checked out.

For the second part, using the information from the first part:
f = r^2/(n*lambda) = (0.0125 m)^2/(1*400x10^-9m) = 390.625

To calculate the power in diopters we take 1/f = 1/390.625 = 2.56x10^03 ! This seems too small of a value.

I am missing something here or have used an incorrect expression.

Thanks for the help!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top