Friction between table and pool ball

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the force of friction and the coefficient of friction between a pool ball and a table, given the ball's weight and travel distance. The normal force is calculated as 0.1666 N using the ball's weight. Participants suggest using Newton's second law to find acceleration, which is determined to be 0.04272 m/s². The force of friction is then calculated using F=ma, leading to a coefficient of friction (µ) of approximately 0.0436, although one participant suggests an error with a different value of µ around 0.003. The conversation emphasizes the importance of verifying calculations and understanding the relationships between forces.
Drey0287
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Assume the weight of a pool ball is .17kg. If the ball traveled 1.2 m in 5.3 seconds, what is the force of Friction and coefficient of friction between the pool ball and the table?

Now, All I know how to do it calculate the normal force which is (9.8)(.17) = .1666 but where do i get from here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Drey0287 said:
Assume the weight of a pool ball is .17kg. If the ball traveled 1.2 m in 5.3 seconds, what is the force of Friction and coefficient of friction between the pool ball and the table?

Now, All I know how to do it calculate the normal force which is (9.8)(.17) = .1666 but where do i get from here?

Hints:Use Newton's second law for the rotational motion.(torque is the sum of momenta of all forces).From there u should find µ.The normal force u calculated should be ten times bigger.
I=\frac{3mr^{2}}{5}

Daniel.
 
I find the acceleration to be 0.04272 m/s^2

Therefore, can you not find the force of friction through F=ma?

F(subF)=(.17kg)(0.04272 m/s^2)

mew=F(subF)/F(subN)

mew=0.007262/0.1666

mew=0.0436

check my work, i may be wrong
 
soccerjayl said:
I find the acceleration to be 0.04272 m/s^2

Therefore, can you not find the force of friction through F=ma?

F(subF)=(.17kg)(0.04272 m/s^2)

mew=F(subF)/F(subN)

mew=0.007262/0.1666

mew=0.0436

check my work, i may be wrong

My µ approximately equal to 0,003.

Show your reasoning to depict you mistakes.

Daniel.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top