How Does Mass Affect Friction in a Pulley System?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving a pulley system with two masses on a table and one hanging mass. The coefficients of static and kinetic friction are provided, along with the masses of the blocks. The first part of the problem requires determining the minimum mass of m1 needed to prevent m2 from sliding off the table, while the second part involves calculating the acceleration of m3 when m1 is removed. The original poster attempts to solve part a using free body diagrams and equations but encounters difficulties in their calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding static friction and the forces acting on the system to find the correct solution.
ArticMage
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/589/showmepl.gif

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Masses m1 and m2 rest on a table 1.2 meters above the floor and are attached to m3 via a very light string and a frictionless pulley as shown above. The coefficient of static friction between the m2 and the table is μs = 0.21 and their coefficient of kinetic friction is μk = 0.14. m2 = 56 kg and m3 = 28 kg.
a) What is the minimum mass that m1 can have to keep the two blocks from sliding off the table?
b) m1 is completely removed. What will be the acceleration of m3? (assume up to be the positive direction).


The Attempt at a Solution


I havn't gotten to b yet only attempted a so far.

a) i make the free body diagram and end up with the following equations.
for m1 \Sigma Fy = N1-m1*g=0

for m2 \Sigma Fy= N2-N1-m2*g=0
and \Sigma Fx= T-\mus*N2=0

and for m3 \Sigma Fy= T-m3*g=0

From there i solve the m3 for T then m2 Fx for N2 then Fy2 for N1 and finally the first for m1. But that doesn't work at all. So if anyone can point out what goes wrong id be glad to hear it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
For part a, I think it's easier to solve the problem intuitively rather than mathematically. Let's first assume that m1 is large enough to keep the two blocks stationary. m2 is then pressing down on the table with a force of (m1+m2)g. Now let's reduce the mass of m1. At some point, the table can no longer provide enough static friction to hold m3 still. At what point does this happen?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top