Friction in Wedges: Calculating Force P

  • Thread starter Thread starter Urmi Roy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the horizontal force P required to start weightless wedges under a 450kg block, considering the angle of friction at 10 degrees. Participants explore various approaches to the problem, including free-body diagrams and the effects of normal forces.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the coefficient of friction as tan(10) and attempts to derive the force P but finds a discrepancy with the book's answer.
  • Another participant suggests that the applied force P will increase the normal force at the top of the wedge.
  • There is confusion about the direction of the applied force P and its components, with discussions on how P can have components along different axes.
  • Participants encourage showing calculations and free-body diagrams to clarify the normal forces and friction involved.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about understanding the implications of previous posts and the calculations involved.
  • A later reply shares a link to a similar problem for additional reference.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct approach or calculations. There are multiple competing views on how to interpret the forces and calculate the normal force, with ongoing confusion and requests for clarification.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention potential conceptual errors and the need for clearer calculations, indicating that assumptions about the forces and their directions may not be fully resolved.

Urmi Roy
Messages
743
Reaction score
1
Code:

Homework Statement


What horizontal force P must be applied to the weightless wedges to start them under the 450kg block,(the angle of friction for all contact surfaces is 10 deg.).


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I tried out the sum in the method that came to my mind first...this is illustrated in the diagrams...
(coeff. of friction at all suraces (mu)=tan10=,176)
the weight of the 450kg block on either wedge is 225kg(each share the weight equally)...but the friction along the top surface of the wedge(in green) is calcuated by mu*(component of the block's weight perpendicular to the wedge's upper surface i.e 225gcos15,where g=acc. due to gravity).
Also,to calculate the friction at the base,we calculate the net downward force...
N-225g+fsin15=0
=> N=225g-fsin15
and F(in pink)= mu*N
Thus,we can easily calculate the net horizontal force P to overcome these two frictional forces...the problem is,my answer does not match the answer in the book(1417.31N)
 

Attachments

  • friction.JPG
    friction.JPG
    11 KB · Views: 571
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Urmi Roy! :smile:

Won't P increase the normal force at the top?
 
How?
 
Well, imagine it's all flat on a table (ie horizontal instead of vertical, so that there's no weight involved) …

the P forces will create a normal force, won't they? :wink:
 
Which one should I imagine as a flat surface? (I still haven't been able to figure this out.)
 
I've been thinking,the P forces are along the horizontal itself,so how can they have any vertical component at all?
 
You're right, they can't.

But they can have a component along any other direction than vertical …

draw any pair of perpendicular axes, and P will have components along both of them, Pcosθ and Psinθ …

the only exception is when θ = 90º (or 0), when the components are P and 0. :smile:
 
Urmi Roy: Your normal force on the slanted interface is currently incorrect. Hint 1: You know the direction of the weight of the upper block (m*g). You know the direction of the normal force, N1, on the upper block. You know the direction of the frictional force on the upper block. Therefore, draw a free-body diagram of the left half of only the upper block showing these three forces, and perform a summation of vertical forces on the upper block, and then solve for the normal force, N1, on the upper block. Show your work, and show your numeric answer for N1; and then someone might check your math.
 
The procedure nvn suggested is just what I did...and I checked and rechecked the calculation(even my teacher did)...I think I made a comceptual error...Thiugh I didn't understand which force tiny-tim was talking about,...perhaps that's where there's something wrong with my working?
 
  • #10
Urmi Roy: Notice the last sentence of post 8. Show your work, and then someone will be able to check your math.
 
  • #11
Urmi Roy said:
The procedure nvn suggested is just what I did...and I checked and rechecked the calculation(even my teacher did)...I think I made a comceptual error...Thiugh I didn't understand which force tiny-tim was talking about,...perhaps that's where there's something wrong with my working?

Urmi Roy, I'm talking about the same normal force that nvn :smile: is.

As he says, show us your calculations, and then we'll see what went wrong, and we'll be able to help.
 
  • #12
Okay,
If N is the normal reaction at the bottom of the wedge(in pink),and f is the friction on the top surface of the wedge,we have

f=mu(225gcos15)

F=mu(225g-fsin15)

Also,summing forces along the x axis,
sigma Fx=(225gsin15)cos15 -fcos15 +P-F=0

Since we know all the quantities in the third equation except P,we can find out P.

(mu is the coefficient of friction at all surfaces)
(PLease refer to the diagram to check the components of the forces)
 
  • #13
Urmi Roy: That is currently incorrect. It currently seems you did not understand post 8 yet. Let's call the pink arrow N2. And let's call the normal force on the slanted surface N1. Reread and perform post 8.

Also, when you show your work, list not only the equations, but also show the numeric values you plug into the equations, and the numeric answer you calculate from each equation. Try again.
 
  • #14
I couldn't get back to this sum,since I had exams in the last one and a half weeks...anyway,you're right,I didn't really understand post 8...even now...it seems what you are talking about is what I showed you in my working out.:((

I just can't see where my current working is wrong.
 
  • #15
Urmi Roy: Pick apart post 8, sentence by sentence, and explain which words are causing you trouble. If you give post 8 a try (whenever you have time), I think you might find it works. Give it a try, and show your work.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
679
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K