Friction Problem: Hill Incline Angle Calculation | Car Engine and Speed

AI Thread Summary
A car's engine propels it up a hill at constant speed and down at double speed, with a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.28. The discussion involves calculating the incline angle using forces acting on the car while ascending and descending. Initial equations suggested an angle of 15.64 degrees, but confusion arose regarding the role of kinetic friction and the relationship between forces when speed changes. Further analysis revealed that the force while descending is half that while ascending, leading to a corrected angle of 5.33 degrees. The calculations highlight the importance of understanding power, force, and friction in this context.
theskyiscrape
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a car's engine, producing a constant power, propels the car up a hill at a constant speed and down the hill at double the speed. if the coefficient of kinetic friction between the car and the road is 0.28, what is the angle of incline of the hill. assume the hill is symmetric.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



While going upwards, friction and weight component are acting downwards.
∴Ef=Ff+mgsinθ
Ef=μN+mgsinθ
=μmgcosθ +mgsinθ

While going downwards, the frictional force reverses direction. but the velocity is double...So i am assuming that the downwards force is double.
∴2Ff=mgsinθ+Ef
Ef=2μmgcosθ-mgsinθ

equate the two expressions:
μmgcosθ +mgsinθ=2μmgcosθ-mgsinθ
2mgsinθ=2μmgcosθ
tan θ=μ=0.28
θ=tan(-1) 0.28
=15.64 degrees
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand how kinetic friction comes into play if the tires are not skidding; the resistance must be provided by rolling or axle friction, and air drag, but I'll assume that the use of the word 'kinetic' is correct. I'm not following your equations or logic, why do you say the downward force (presumably from the cars engine) is doubled? If the power it delivers is constant, but its speed down is doubled, then what is the relationship between the force it delivers up the incline vs. down the incline?
 
PhanthomJay said:
I don't understand how kinetic friction comes into play if the tires are not skidding; the resistance must be provided by rolling or axle friction, and air drag, but I'll assume that the use of the word 'kinetic' is correct. I'm not following your equations or logic, why do you say the downward force (presumably from the cars engine) is doubled? If the power it delivers is constant, but its speed down is doubled, then what is the relationship between the force it delivers up the incline vs. down the incline?

that might be the case but axle friction and air drag have not been covered. to be honest, my solution was a stab in the dark...
 
theskyiscrape said:
that might be the case but axle friction and air drag have not been covered. to be honest, my solution was a stab in the dark...
Well it wasn't too bad of a stab considering the ambiguity in the problem statement. You might want to try again, noting that power = Fv, which is constant up or down the incline, and use Newton 1 to sum all forces equal to zero. Watch your math and plus and minus signs.
 
PhanthomJay said:
Well it wasn't too bad of a stab considering the ambiguity in the problem statement. You might want to try again, noting that power = Fv, which is constant up or down the incline, and use Newton 1 to sum all forces equal to zero. Watch your math and plus and minus signs.

This is the right answer


P1/P2=F1v1/F2v2
∴F2*2v1=F1v1
F2=0.5F1
so the force while going down is half the force while coming up.
Ff=mgsinθ+0.5Ef
Ef=2Ff-2mgsinθ
equating the equations:
2μmgcosθ-2mgsinθ=μmgcosθ +mgsinθ
μmgcosθ=3mgsinθ
tanθ=μ/3
θ=tan-1(0.0933)
=5.33 degrees..
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top