Fuison/fission, where does the energy come from?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wavingerwin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
wavingerwin
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
I've been wondering,
Iron has the most binding energy per nucleon amongst elements and thus realized to be the most "stable" element.

Smaller or bigger elements (compared to iron) can fuse or undergo fission respectively.
As they fuse or undergo fission, it becomes more stable (the product element will have more binding energy per nucleon, losing its average mass per nucleon).

This surplus in binding energy per nucleon comes from the rest mass deficit of the product atoms compared to the reactants.

Atomic bombs use principles in fission and fusion. So, where does the energy released for the 'explosion' come from?

if it comes from the mass deficit between product and reactant, where does the energy for the increase in binding energy come from?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Binding energy is negative. Otherwise elements would all just fall apart!
 
It comes from the force between nucleons.
 
To add my two cents worth to the two correct responses above: The binding energy is the average energy required to unbind a nucleon from the nucleus. It doesn't come from anywhere because it is not a form of energy but an energy deficit. It is like gravitational potential energy. We say an object on the Earth surface has -GmM/R of gravitational binding energy. It takes that much energy to unbind it from the Earth's gravitation.

AM
 
v_bachtiar said:
I've been wondering,
Iron has the most binding energy per nucleon amongst elements and thus realized to be the most "stable" element.

Smaller or bigger elements (compared to iron) can fuse or undergo fission respectively.
As they fuse or undergo fission, it becomes more stable (the product element will have more binding energy per nucleon, losing its average mass per nucleon).

This surplus in binding energy per nucleon comes from the rest mass deficit of the product atoms compared to the reactants.

Atomic bombs use principles in fission and fusion. So, where does the energy released for the 'explosion' come from?

if it comes from the mass deficit between product and reactant, where does the energy for the increase in binding energy come from?

Thank you!
it is known that to bring the two nuclei together(because there is electrostatic repulsion) , there is needed some force,supplied by external energy source,but when nuclei bring together they suffer opposing force cancelling net effect.But its important to notice than these external energy cannot be lost ,so this energy is added to binding energy(as nuclear energy),but the big amount of mass is lost contributing the energy release.Donot be confused that these beneficial energy came from loosing matter of nucleons and not from original binding energy.And talking about final binding energy its the original binding energy plus the kinetic energy (original external energy supplied)
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top