A CED: Solving the Full-blown Classical Electromagnetism Problem

dextercioby
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
13,395
Reaction score
4,064
Is it me, or the overall problem in CED is not addressed anywhere?
Statement of the problem: Let there be two massive electrically charged particles of invariant masses m1 and m2 and electric charges q1 and q2, respectively. They are free to move arbitrarily in Minkowski spacetime endowed with (+---) metric tensor. One is further given the full vacuum set of Maxwell's equations written in terms of a generic electric field E and magnetic field B. Please, write down (in covariant form, i.e. using spacetime (pseudo)tensors) the full set of dynamical equations for the motion of particles and the 2 fields that they generate. How are all these equations written in the presence of a gravitational field described by GR?

What do you think? Is the problem written somewhere, together with the solution, or can we (you) write the down the solution here?

EDIT after 3 days: NO TAKE? Ok, I will spend more time reading/working on this.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know about the full treatment for the "two moving charges" problem in relativistic electrodynamics ( I leave that to the experts here ), but I can give you at least the basic equations in the presence of gravity. Maxwell's electric equation is

\displaystyle{F{^{\alpha \beta }}_{||\beta }=4\pi J^\alpha }

The magnetic equation is

\displaystyle{F_{\alpha \beta ||\gamma }+F_{\beta \gamma ||\alpha }+F_{\gamma \alpha ||\beta }=0}

And the equation of motion then is

\displaystyle{ma^\alpha =qF^{\alpha \beta }u_\beta }

wherein F denotes the usual electromagnetic field tensor, and the "||" means covariant differentiation, which is what accounts for the metric. You could alternatively write the Maxwell equations with differential forms, which would probably be more intuitive.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top