Fun Magnetic Scalar Potential Problem

hylander4
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
"Fun" Magnetic Scalar Potential Problem

Homework Statement



An infinite cylindrical shell of radius b is placed inside a constant field B which points along the upwards z-axis. A second cylindrical shell of radius a<b is placed inside the first cylindrical shell, and the volume from b>r>a is filled with a paramagnetic material of permeability u. Find the magnetic field everywhere.

Homework Equations



H = B/(u_0) + M

H = -grad W

Laplacian W = -grad M

W is continuous over all boundaries.
The change in dW/dr over a boundary is equal to the negative change in Magnetization over the boundary.

Cylindrical laplace equation solution (From my undergraduate E+M notebook)

W(r, phi) = D_0 + A_0*(a+b*phi) +
$\EPSILON$ [r^n + (A_n*r^-n)]*[B_n*cos(n*phi)+C_n*sin(n*phi)]

Another version of this equation can be found here http://www.cord.edu/faculty/gealy/physics315/SepVarsCyl.pdf" on page two.

Summed from n = 1 to infinity


The Attempt at a Solution



Since there's no free current in this situation, I tried using magnetic scalar potential to solve this problem. Unfortunately, I end up with too many variable in the proposed Laplace equation solutions that I need to create to use the boundary conditions.

In my main attempt I had four boundary conditions and seven types of variables.

My main problem is that I need to find the H field to find the B-field, but in order to find the H-field, I also need a function for the paramagnetic material's Magnetization density M.

The forum wants me to post my attempts, but I've already filled three pages of notebook paper with failed algebra and I doubt that that would be constructive. I'm not really looking for an exact solution, I really just need general guidance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Usually you have B = μ0 (H + M) = μ0 μ H, which determines M to be (μ-1) H. In vacuum, of course, μ = 1.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top