Functional equation f(x)^n f(a - x) = 1

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jonas Hall
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functional Scale
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a function that satisfies the functional equation f(x)^n f(a - x) = 1 for different values of n, particularly focusing on the case where n ≠ 1. Participants explore various mathematical approaches, including specific boundary conditions and series expansions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant claims to have proven that for n = 1, f(x) = x/(a - x) satisfies the functional equation under certain boundary conditions: f(0) = 0, f(a/2) = 1, and f(a) = ∞.
  • Another participant suggests that for n = 1, the general solution can be expressed as e^{Φ(x,a-x)}, where Φ is antisymmetric, leading to f(x)f(a-x) = 1.
  • For n = 2, one participant proposes that the only solution appears to be f(x) = 1, but acknowledges that this does not satisfy the boundary condition f(0) = 0.
  • There is a suggestion to use Taylor expansions to explore potential solutions, although one participant notes that this approach may not satisfy the boundary conditions.
  • A later reply introduces the idea of using a Laurent expansion instead of a Taylor expansion, particularly around x = a, to accommodate the boundary condition f(0) = 0.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the applicability of exponential solutions given the boundary conditions and suggests that the antisymmetric Φ approach could still be viable with certain limits.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the solutions for n ≠ 1, with multiple competing views on the applicability of different mathematical approaches and the validity of proposed functions under the specified boundary conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to boundary conditions and the nature of the proposed expansions, indicating that the solutions may depend heavily on the specific forms of the functions and the assumptions made during the discussion.

Jonas Hall
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Hi,

In a problem I have been working on for a while now I have found that I want to find the function satisfying the functional relation

f(x)n f(a - x) = 1

for n = 1 I believe I have proven that f(x) = x/(a - x). On this page is an answer I do not quite understand. One of the prerequisits for f(x) in my problem was that f(0) = 0, f(a/2) = 1 and f(a) = ∞. I have difficulties seeing that the answer provided will satisfy f(0) = 0.

Apart from this, I have made no progress what so ever in adressing the case where n ≠ 1. In particular I have failed to find solutions for when n = 2.

The problem is this: I want to make a scale mapping where f(x) represents the value and x represents the position of the scale such that the graph of 1/xn is a straight line from positions (0, a) through ((a/2, a/2) to (a, 0), representing the values (0, ∞) through (1, 1) to (∞, 0).

How can I go about finding f(x) for n ≠ 1?

Oh, and I don't have any problem with not getting to solve it myself - I you know the answer, please just tell me!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DuckAmuck
Physics news on Phys.org
For ##n=1## the general solution is of the form ## e^{\Phi(x,a-x)}## where ##\Phi## is antisymmetric so ##f(x)f(a-x)=e^{\Phi(x,a-x)+\Phi(a-x,x)}=e^{\Phi(x,a-x)-\Phi(x,a-x)}=1##, so your equation is satisfied. After it specify the solution in the case where ##\Phi(x,a-x)=C(2x-a)##. For ##n=2## I don't see other solutions than ##f(x)=1## ...

You can assume that ##f## admits a Taylor expansion of the form ##f(x)=a_ {0}+a_{1}x+ a_{2}x^2+...## you can put this into your equation and use a math program in order to find relations with coefficients ... You will obtain an infinite system of equations to solve ...
 
f(x) = 1 does not satisty f(0) = 0. Nor does any exponential solution... Your suggestion with taylor expansions seem interesting though, I will attempt it when I have some more time.
 
ok, before I spoke about the problem in general I didn't consider the boundary condition. So in this case the exponential is not your solution ... If you want this condition you can search directly a Taylor (or better Laurent (with negative exponents)) expansion of this kind ##f(x)=a_{1}x+a_{2}x^{2}+\cdots ##
 
I would try a Laurent expansion around x=a. We know f(0)=0 so there Taylor and Laurent would be identical. This could limit the function too much.

The approach with an antisymmetric Φ should still work, if you let Φ go to -infinity if its first argument goes to zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ssnow

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K