Functions, intersections, and unions

  • Thread starter Thread starter lokisapocalypse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
AI Thread Summary
To show that g(A ∩ B) is a subset of g(A) ∩ g(B), it is sufficient to demonstrate that if x is in g(A ∩ B), then x must also be in both g(A) and g(B). This follows from the property that if A ∩ B is a subset of A, any element in g(A ∩ B) will also be in g(A) and g(B). For the union, the conjecture is that g(A) ∪ g(B) is a subset of g(A ∪ B), reflecting a similar relationship to the intersection. The discussion also touches on properties of set operations, noting that the intersection of complements equals the complement of a union, and mentions associative and distributive properties of set operations. Understanding these relationships and properties is key to proving the required statements.
lokisapocalypse
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Okay I need to show that for a function g,

g(A n B) is a subset of g(A) n g(B) where A and B are sets and n means intersection.

I also need to show something similar about the union but I'm not given the relation. I have to figure that out myself. Any pointers on how to get started on either of these?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To show that:

g(A \cap B) \subseteq g(A) \cap g(B)

it suffices to show that:

x \in g(A \cap B) \Rightarrow x \in g(A) \cap g(B)

This basically says that if you have any sets X and Y, and X is inside Y (i.e. X is a subset of Y), then any element inside X must obviously be inside Y. So, start by assuming x \in g(A \cap B) and deduce g(A) \cap g(B). It's pretty clear. If x \in g(A \cap B), then x \in g(A), since (A \cap B) \subseteq A. Similarly, if x \in g(A \cap B), then x \in g(A). So we have that if x is in g(A \cap B), then x is in both g(A) and g(B). Obviously, this means that x is in g(A) \cap g(B), and the proof is done.

I'll let you prove the union one, as you should know how to do it now. Although I'm not sure, my guess would be that g(A) U g(B) is a subset of g(A U B). Note how it's kind of like the "backwards" version of the previous proposition. Intersection and Union have that type of relationship, i.e. if you have a proposition with unions in it, then you can sort of "invert" things and change unions to intersections to get another true proposition.

For example, if we let A' denote the complement of A, then:

A\prime \cap B\prime = (A \cup B)\prime

The intersection of complements is the complement of a union. If you take the complements first, then you take the intersection of the sets. If you "invert" the order, and take the complement last, then you union the sets first.
 
Oh and one more thing,

I know that (A n B) n C = A n (B n C)
and that A n (B u C) = (A n B) U (A n C).

I remember those properties from another class I took but I cannot remember what they are called. Can someone tell me this?
 
first one is associative, second is distributive (just like algebra),,, there are many more including DeMorgan's laws
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top