Fusion Variable Game: Challenge Your Score at Princeton Plasma Physics Lab!

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a flash game simulating a tokamak at Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, where players optimize variables like power, magnetic field intensity, and plasma density to achieve high scores. The highest score reported is 102.80, with claims of a maximum score of 148, or 168 using a bug. Players note the interdependence of temperature, plasma density, and magnetic field strength, emphasizing the complexity of optimizing these variables. There is curiosity about the limits of the magnetic field and the absence of details regarding plasma heating methods, particularly concerning neutral beam injection. The conversation highlights the intricate balance of energy production and loss in achieving optimal plasma conditions.
theCandyman
Messages
397
Reaction score
2
I was reading about the undergraduate research opportunity at Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory and I ran across this fun flash game. It simulates a tokamak, and you can control the power used for heating, magnetic field intensity, and plasma density.

http://ippex.pppl.gov/tokamak/tokamak.htm

So far, mostly through entering numbers and optimizing each one and then readjusting the others, the highest score I have gotten is 102.80. I was going to go to Matlab and graph how each variable changes the score and the temperature, but I have found that adjusting one of the others just a little affects the plasma so that while I might make a change that would look like it helps, it may have the opposite effect.

Here is the set up for my highest score:
Auxiliary power: 7.58 [MW]
Plasma Density: 2.41 [10^20 / m^3]
Magnetic field: 14 [T]

I know that a higher one can be achieved, because the page claims that the highest score achieved was 148; 168 if you use a bug in the program.

In the help section it mentions that temperature and plasma density is dependent on the strength of the magnetic field, and I assumed that if the magnetic field increases, so do the limits for temperature and plasma density. I could gather a bunch of data from a bunch of points, but I would like to think there is an easier way to guess a good value. Anyone have suggestions?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
The magnetic field applies pressure to the plasma, and the plasma pressure is based on nkT as one might guess. In addition, the energy losses due to bremstrahlung, cyclotron radiation, particle diffusion also increase with n, T, and cyclotron rad increases also with B.

One would have to know the energy loss terms in addition to the energy production term. There is a maximum point on the function described by the sum of these terms.

Is there a limit on magnitude of B?

Also, does it have neutral beam injection?
 
The limit of the magnetic field is 14 Tesla, there is not anything said about how the plasma is heated, only the option to adjust the power to heating.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...

Similar threads

Back
Top