Galactic angular velocity of interstellar cloud

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the Galactic angular velocity (Ω) of an interstellar cloud and its ability to collapse radially. It is established that if Ω exceeds the threshold of sqrt(4πGρ/3), the cloud cannot collapse, highlighting the stabilizing effect of higher angular velocities. Participants are encouraged to conceptualize why increased angular velocity prevents collapse, considering extreme cases. The conversation also explores the conditions necessary for the cloud to achieve equilibrium, noting that collapse occurs at zero angular velocity and is inhibited at high velocities. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing the stability of interstellar clouds in the Galactic context.
bmace
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I've got a question that I am stumped on right now

Show that if the Galactic angular velocity \Omega
of an interstellar cloud is > sqrt(4piG\rho/3), the cloud can not collapse in the radial direction. Estimate \Omega and compare it to the rotation rate of the Galaxy.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
What is stumping you?
Start out conceptually, why would a higher angular velocity prevent a cloud from collapsing?---It might help to think about extremal cases.

Under what conditions would the cloud be in equilibrium?---I.e. if it collapses at zero angular velocity, and won't collapse at very high velocities... where will it be in equilibrium (in the radial direction).
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top