Galaxies Accelerating at End of Universe: Big Bang Theory Wrong?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zrower33
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Galaxies at the end of the universe are observed to be accelerating away from us, but this does not disprove the Big Bang theory. The Big Bang model has been validated by various observations, including predictions about the Cosmic Microwave Background radiation. While the theory may require adjustments as new data emerges, it remains fundamentally sound. The acceleration of galaxies is linked to the expansion of the universe, which the Big Bang theory already accounts for. Current research is focused on understanding the causes of this acceleration, particularly through the concept of dark energy.
zrower33
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if anyone has heard about galaxies at the end of the universe that are starting to shoot off at a faster acceleration, which would prove the Big Bang theory to be wrong. If anyone else had heard about this i would like to know about it. Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Are you referring to the accelearating expansion of the universe ?
Or the observation that the farther away galaxies are, the faster they are receiding from us ?

The big bang theory will not be proven "all out wrong". Many observation confirm the accuracy of the BB model in its larger form. For exemple, the BB model predicted the existence of very precise variations in the Cosmic Radiation Background before the technologie existed to mesure them. When this was finaly done, the predictions were confirmed to a degree of precision that confirms at the very least that the BB model is on the right track. It is true, many things remain to be figured out ( like what actually happened in the very first few milliseconds ) and we will most certainly make new observations that are going to require some readjustments of certain aspects of the model. What we will not find is something that completely disproves it.
 
Hi zrower33! Welcome to PF. Only one fatal flaw in your conjecture. The edge and center of the universe are everywhere at the same time. We are the most ancient observable object in the universe, yet we see an equal number of other galaxies in every direction.
 
Mean-Hippy said:
The big bang theory will not be proven "all out wrong". Many observation confirm the accuracy of the BB model in its larger form. For exemple, the BB model predicted the existence of very precise variations in the Cosmic Radiation Background

Even just the radiation itself is evidence for the theory. I agree with your general analysis, though, the big questions at this point are all pre-CMB. The Big Bang Theory in its most literal interpretation, that everything started from a singularity, is extremely difficult to prove and may as well be philosophy at this point.
 
In the March 2005 issue of Scierntific American there is an article discussing misconceptions about the Big Bang. One of the items is the fact that galaxies are moving away from us faster than the speed of light because of the expansion. The point is that the speed of light limit is for object motion not space expansion effect.
 
zrower33 said:
I was wondering if anyone has heard about galaxies at the end of the universe that are starting to shoot off at a faster acceleration, which would prove the Big Bang theory to be wrong. If anyone else had heard about this i would like to know about it. Thanks

Welcome to PF, zrower33. As noted, the recently discovered accelerating expansion of the universe would not disprove Big Bang Theory (although the theory would be modified to incorporate this new information). Big Bang Theory already explained the expansion of the universe. Astronomers are now researching what is causing the acceleration (check out info on 'dark energy').
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top