Galilean invariance of Maxwell equation

  • Thread starter sadegh4137
  • Start date
  • #1
72
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

always say us Maxwell equations are not covariance under Galilean Transformation

They say merely this because of constant speed of light that the result of Maxwell Equations

But there arent any excitability prove for Non-Ggalilean invariance of Maxwell equation

I Decided try to show this
i found this article when i was searched net




do you think this is true?
 

Attachments

Answers and Replies

  • #2
DrDu
Science Advisor
6,032
759
You want to read:


@article{le1973galilean,
title={Galilean electromagnetism},
author={Le Bellac, M. and L{\'e}vy-Leblond, J.M.},
journal={Il Nuovo Cimento B (1971-1996)},
volume={14},
number={2},
pages={217--234},
year={1973},
publisher={Springer}
}
 
  • #3
Meir Achuz
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
3,519
104
The paper is wrong. It misinterprets the meaning of epsilonzero in SI.
In any system of units, Maxwell derived that EM waves would propagate at c, which the paper is correct in saying was first measured by W and K. Galilean invariance is broken because it would make c no longer a constant. If you use, SI, then epsilonzero would no longer be constant, while miraculously muzero would be constant.
 
  • #4
610
5
http://faculty.uml.edu/cbaird/95.658%282011%29/Lecture10.pdf" [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
46
7
http://faculty.uml.edu/cbaird/95.658%282011%29/Lecture10.pdf" [Broken]
Thank you chrisbaird, this is an excellent read. I now have a greater understanding of Einstein’s work, genius, and boldness.

Believe it or not, I've been using the term bold (as the paper does) to describe Einstein for several years now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #6
vanhees71
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2019 Award
15,311
6,708
What's concretely wrong with the paper by LeBellac et al? They investigate the well-known non-relativistic limits of classical electromagnetics in a systematic way. "Non-relativistic" can of course only mean to describe the matter (or more abstractly charges and currents) non-relativistically. Em. wave fields can never behave non-relativistic, but the static, stationary and quasi-stationary limits do.
 

Related Threads on Galilean invariance of Maxwell equation

Replies
7
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
501
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
19K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
343
Top