Galileo's Acceleration Hypothesis

  • Thread starter Thread starter FMAgent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the relationship between the slope of a graph plotting distance against time squared and acceleration in the context of Galileo's acceleration hypothesis. Participants clarify that the equation for distance under constant acceleration can be expressed as d = 1/2at², where the slope of the graph represents 1/2 of the acceleration when initial velocity is zero. By rewriting the equation in the form y = mx + b, they establish that the slope (m) corresponds to 1/2a. The conversation emphasizes the connection between the quadratic nature of the motion equation and the linear representation in the graph. Overall, the participants successfully clarify how to interpret the slope in relation to acceleration.
FMAgent
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We rolled a ball down a ramp and timed the time it took to cover a certain distance (15cm, 30cm, 45cm, 60cm, 75cm, 90cm, 105cm, 120cm.) we input the data into a graph (x= time (s^2), y= distance (m)) my partner and I understand that the slope is the 1/2 of the acceleration, but we don't understand how to explain/prove the slope is 1/2 of a.

any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi FMAgent! Welcome to PF! :smile:
FMAgent said:
… my partner and I understand that the slope is the 1/2 of the acceleration, but we don't understand how to explain/prove the slope is 1/2 of a.

How you prove that depends on how much you know

have you done calculus yet? :wink:
 
No, I haven't done calculus, this is my first actual physics course in high school.
 
then you're going to want to apply what you have been taught about motion with constant acceleration

for example: do you know the equation x = v0t + \frac{1}{2}at2?
 
Yes, so should I explain that d=vit*1/2at^2 is similar to y=mx+b by comparing the variables?
 
well, y = mx + b is a linear equation, where x = v0t + \frac{1}{2}at2 is a quadratic equation
 
SHISHKABOB said:
well, y = mx + b is a linear equation, where x = v0t + \frac{1}{2}at2 is a quadratic equation
But my initial velocity is 0 therefor removing the variable x time completely correct? or at least making it zero.
 
if we rewrite x = v0t + \frac{1}{2}at2 with x as the variable and y as the independent variable, and then the two constants v0 and a as b and a respectively, we get

y = bx + \frac{1}{2}ax2

so what happens if b (which is the initial velocity) is zero?
 
well b is zero, because my Vi is zero, and zero times anything is zero. so if I made distance the y, t^2 the x, then wouldn't 1/2a be my slope? vit being the b but not really nessisary because its zero?
 
  • #10
it's not so much that it's not necessary, it's just that it's zero.

And well, what does it look like if we write it like that?
 
  • #11
d= 1/2at^2 + 0
 
  • #12
right, so we have two equations

d = \frac{1}{2}at2
y = \frac{1}{2}ax

where y = d, and t2 = x

the second equation looks like your graph, right? And you know that the first equation is a fundamental equation of constant acceleration, right?

so can you see the relationship?
 
  • #13
yes that's the relationship I was looking for. :smile:
 
  • #14
glad I could help :)
 

Similar threads

Back
Top