Galiliei transformations explicit proof

ma18
Messages
93
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Show explicitly that

ei*ε*κu * ei*ε*κv * e-i*ε*κu* e-i*ε*κv = Identity + ε2 [Kv,Ku + O (ε3)

The Attempt at a Solution



Kv,Ku = Kv*Ku - Ku*Kv

I'm not sure exactly how to approach this problem. I know that

U (tau) = ∏ ei*su*Ku

and that for operators O --> O' = U O U

I have this information but I don't know how to put it together, any help would be greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest expanding the exponentials up to order ##\epsilon^2## and then simply checking that the expression reduces to the given one.
 
Dont let wolfram do it for you, just multiply the terms together and keep only terms up to order two in epsilon.
 
Orodruin said:
two
Orodruin said:
Dont let wolfram do it for you, just multiply the terms together and keep only terms up to order two in epsilon.

Alright, If I do that I get

(1+i*e*v-e^2*v^2/2 +i*ex-e^2*x*v-e^2*x^2/2)(1-i*e*v-e^2*v^2/2-i*e*x-e^2*v*x-e^2*x^2/2)

then expanding that leads to many terms

upload_2015-10-26_15-47-1.png

which doesn't lead to the correct answer, perhaps I am making an algebraic mistake

Orodruin said:
Dont let wolfram do it for you, just multiply the terms together and keep only terms up to order two in epsilon.
 
Go order by order. First check that all the linear terms cancel.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top