1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Gamma factor in legth and mass demostration

  1. Jan 8, 2007 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    I'm studing relativity(on extraschool) and known about gamma factor influences time, after some tries, I demostrate that if A is at Va, in relation to B: "light distance"=sqrt("light distance for B"^2-"distance traveled by A"^2)

    where we say that "light distance"=c*"ta"; "light distance for B"=c*"tb"; and "distance traveled by A"=Vatb resolving and we demonstrate it...i gess you know what i mean....

    now my problem is who to demonstrate that leght and mass are too influenced by gamma factor.

    2. Relevant equations

    wish i know then...

    3. The attempt at a solution

    don't have a tought...:X
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 8, 2007 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    You mean you wish to prove length contraction?
  4. Jan 8, 2007 #3
    indeed, and mass, but by maths method, not by "concept" method, what is the begining? what is the permiss that is missing me to acept that Y can too interfer in mass and leght(by math method)
  5. Jan 8, 2007 #4


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Length contraction follows directly from time dilation. Time dilation can be 'proved' using a simple thought experiment. Length contraction follows directly from the lerentz transformations, so there is little in the way of a 'mathematical' proof, as far as I know.
  6. Jan 8, 2007 #5
    yes yes, till there i agree with it, but i wnat to demonstrate it mathematicaly...

    ok, my point is:

    for have time dilatation we have that:

    2 obeservers, A and B, A is moving at speed Va and B is still.
    "A" have a light clock(2 perfect mirrors, 1 photosensor, 1 laser making a 90º to mirrors).

    as light travels at same speed at diferent referencials, we have that B will see the light moving not at 90º but at a diferent angle.
    A will jut see light moving up and down like nothing was hapening...

    now, from trignometry, [tex] c_1=sqrt(H^2-c_2^2) [/tex]

    as [tex]V=d/t[/tex],

    we have that:
    distance that light takes, measured by B is H,
    distance travel by light, measured by A is [tex]c_1[/tex];
    distance travel A, measured by B, is [tex]c_2[/tex];

    so as [tex]d=V \cdot t[/tex];

    [tex]t_A \cdot c= \sqrt{(t_B \cdot c)^2-(t_b \cdot V_a)^2}<=>t_B= \frac{t_A}{ \sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}[/tex]

    now, i demonstrated with maths the time dilatation....how i demonstrate leght contraction and mass dilatation???
    Last edited: Jan 8, 2007
  7. Jan 9, 2007 #6
    still looking for some clue, i've search in wiki, but everything is already demonstrated, they only put the formulas there....the rest is explication of then...:(
  8. Jan 11, 2007 #7


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    consider a light clock [whose separation of mirrors is] oriented in the direction of motion, rather than perpendicular...
    ..and don't forget to use the principle of relativity.
  9. Jan 14, 2007 #8
    ok, after some tries, i think i reach a point it's correct, however, i would like a confirmation of what i've done.

    so, to demonstrate a leght contration, I used this logic:

    [tex]t_B= \frac{t_A}{ \sqrt{1 - \frac{v_a^2}{c^2}}}, V=\frac{d}{t}<=>t=\frac{d}{v}[/tex]
    with d as the leght travel by "a".

    so, as v_a is equal to both observers,

    [tex]\frac{d_b}{v_a}=\frac{d_a/v_a}{ \sqrt{1 - \frac{v_a^2}{c^2}}}[/tex]

    what is equal to:

    [tex]\frac{d_b}{v_a}=\frac{d_a}{v_a \cdot \sqrt{1 - \frac{v_a^2}{c^2}}}[/tex]

    what is equal to:

    [tex]d_b=\frac{d_a}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v_a^2}{c^2}}}[/tex]

    what is equal to:

    [tex]d_a=d_b \cdot \sqrt{1 - \frac{v_a^2}{c^2}}}[/tex]

    so, to observer "a", who is moving, leght is everytime lower than to "b", and convertor factor is "Y"

    am I right??

    to demonstrate mass dilatation, I dout it's correct by my though, however, i putted it here:biggrin: :

    [tex]d_a=d_b \cdot \sqrt{1 - \frac{v_a^2}{c^2}}}[/tex]
    [tex]D= \frac{m}{V}[/tex]
    where m is mass, D is density, and V is Volume

    so, considering a rectangular object,

    [tex]m= D \cdot (H \cdot W \cdot d)[/tex]
    where H is High, w is Width, and d is Leght

    considering m_a the mass of "a" for the observer "a" and m_b the mass of "a" for the observer "b"

    for moving observer "a"
    [tex]m_a= D \cdot H \cdot W \cdot d_a[/tex]

    for rest observer "b":
    [tex]m_b= D \cdot H \cdot W \cdot \frac{d_a}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v_a^2}{c^2}}}}[/tex]

    so, taking D off:

    [tex]\frac{m_a}{H \cdot W \cdot d_a}=\frac{m_b}{H \cdot W \cdot d_a} \cdot \sqrt{1 - \frac{v_a^2}{c^2}}}[/tex]

    as H, W, D and d_a are equal to both observers,

    [tex]m_a=m_b \cdot \sqrt{1 - \frac{v_a^2}{c^2}}}[/tex]


    [tex]m_b=\frac{m_a}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v_a^2}{c^2}}}}[/tex]

    can it be done with this logic? or we need to use another way??

    thanks in advance, and hope wasn't too annoying
    Last edited: Jan 14, 2007
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?