Gamma factor when doing four momentum problems

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the gamma factor in four-momentum problems, particularly in scenarios involving particle collisions and the squaring of four-momentum vectors. Participants are examining the implications of the gamma factor in different contexts of relativistic momentum.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning why the gamma factor appears to drop off in certain expressions related to four-momentum. There is also a discussion about the correct formulation of the gamma factor and its implications in various scenarios, including collisions of particles.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with some participants providing corrections regarding the expression for the gamma factor. There are multiple interpretations being explored regarding the role of the gamma factor in different four-momentum scenarios, particularly in relation to conservation laws.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the application of the gamma factor in specific cases, as well as concerns about the conservation of momentum in proposed scenarios. Participants are navigating through these assumptions and definitions without reaching a consensus.

bonbon22
Messages
92
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Why does the gamma factor drop off when doing a four momentum problem?
Relevant Equations
ϒ = gamma factor = lorentz factor = 1-( v^2/c^2)
So if i had this problem where i am squaring a four momentum vector with itself which gives

P2 = (##\gamma mc## )2 - ##\gamma##2## m ##2##\vec v## *##\vec v##

I have been told that the gamma factor is not considered at all. why would the gamma factor drop off? Does this rule apply to any four momentum problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, you have the wrong expression for the gamma factor, i.e., you have written ##\gamma = 1 - v^2/c^2## when it should be ##\gamma = 1/\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}##. That it falls out from the expression for ##P^2## is basic algebra from there.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bonbon22
Orodruin said:
First of all, you have the wrong expression for the gamma factor, i.e., you have written ##\gamma = 1 - v^2/c^2## when it should be ##\gamma = 1/\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}##. That it falls out from the expression for ##P^2## is basic algebra from there.
If i had this other scenario where one proton is smashing into another which is stationary. Which creates a new particle, also stationary. Then balancing the four momentum i get P1 + P2 = P3 squaring i get P1^2 + P2^2 +P1.P2 =P3^2 . Since particle 2 let's say in this case is stationary the v2 becomes zero so using the Lorentz factor equation plugging in i get gamma 2 = 1. So is it possible then for the P1.P2 term to lose the gamma1 factor?
 
bonbon22 said:
If i had this other scenario where one proton is smashing into another which is stationary. Which creates a new particle, also stationary.
This would violate conservation of momentum as you would have non-zero momentum before the collision and zero momentum after.

bonbon22 said:
P1^2 + P2^2 +P1.P2 =P3^2
It should be ##p_1^2 + p_2^2 + 2p_1 \cdot p_2 = p_3^2##.
bonbon22 said:
So is it possible then for the P1.P2 term to lose the gamma1 factor?
It is not clear to me exactly what you are asking here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K