Gamma factor when doing four momentum problems

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the gamma factor in four-momentum problems, particularly when squaring a four-momentum vector. A correction is made regarding the gamma factor's definition, clarifying it should be γ = 1/√(1-v²/c²). The conversation explores scenarios involving particle collisions, emphasizing that the gamma factor may not always be present in certain terms, particularly when one particle is stationary. It is highlighted that neglecting the gamma factor could lead to violations of conservation laws, specifically momentum conservation. The overall consensus is that understanding the algebraic manipulation of four-momentum is crucial for accurate calculations.
bonbon22
Messages
92
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Why does the gamma factor drop off when doing a four momentum problem?
Relevant Equations
ϒ = gamma factor = lorentz factor = 1-( v^2/c^2)
So if i had this problem where i am squaring a four momentum vector with itself which gives

P2 = (##\gamma mc## )2 - ##\gamma##2## m ##2##\vec v## *##\vec v##

I have been told that the gamma factor is not considered at all. why would the gamma factor drop off? Does this rule apply to any four momentum problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, you have the wrong expression for the gamma factor, i.e., you have written ##\gamma = 1 - v^2/c^2## when it should be ##\gamma = 1/\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}##. That it falls out from the expression for ##P^2## is basic algebra from there.
 
  • Like
Likes bonbon22
Orodruin said:
First of all, you have the wrong expression for the gamma factor, i.e., you have written ##\gamma = 1 - v^2/c^2## when it should be ##\gamma = 1/\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}##. That it falls out from the expression for ##P^2## is basic algebra from there.
If i had this other scenario where one proton is smashing into another which is stationary. Which creates a new particle, also stationary. Then balancing the four momentum i get P1 + P2 = P3 squaring i get P1^2 + P2^2 +P1.P2 =P3^2 . Since particle 2 let's say in this case is stationary the v2 becomes zero so using the Lorentz factor equation plugging in i get gamma 2 = 1. So is it possible then for the P1.P2 term to lose the gamma1 factor?
 
bonbon22 said:
If i had this other scenario where one proton is smashing into another which is stationary. Which creates a new particle, also stationary.
This would violate conservation of momentum as you would have non-zero momentum before the collision and zero momentum after.

bonbon22 said:
P1^2 + P2^2 +P1.P2 =P3^2
It should be ##p_1^2 + p_2^2 + 2p_1 \cdot p_2 = p_3^2##.
bonbon22 said:
So is it possible then for the P1.P2 term to lose the gamma1 factor?
It is not clear to me exactly what you are asking here.
 
Beams of electrons and protons move parallel to each other in the same direction. They ______. a. attract each other. b. repel each other. c. neither attract nor repel. d. the force of attraction or repulsion depends upon the speed of the beams. This is a previous-year-question of CBSE Board 2023. The answer key marks (b) as the right option. I want to know why we are ignoring Coulomb's force?
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
I treat this question as two cases of Doppler effect. (1) When the sound wave travels from bat to moth Speed of sound = 222 x 1.5 = 333 m/s Frequency received by moth: $$f_1=\frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ (2) When the sound wave is reflected from moth back to bat Frequency received by bat (moth as source and bat as observer): $$f_2=\frac{333}{333-v}\times f_1$$ $$230.3=\frac{333}{333-v}\times \frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ Solving this equation, I get ##v=6.1## m/s but the answer key is...