Gasoline Engine Turbocharger Concept.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an innovative rear-mounted turbocharger concept for gasoline engines, proposing a unique exhaust routing to enhance efficiency. The design suggests using pulse-matched headers leading to a larger exhaust pipe, with the turbo mounted at the front of the vehicle to maintain optimal exhaust temperatures and reduce backpressure. Concerns are raised about the effectiveness of cooling exhaust gases, as it may lead to energy loss and poor turbo performance. The conversation emphasizes the importance of minimizing distance and maximizing pipe size to improve turbo response and drivability. Overall, the proposed setup aims to outperform traditional and rear-mounted turbo systems, but practical considerations about energy retention and turbo dynamics are crucial for success.
Chevalade
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Conventional turbocharging is done from the manifolds. Or as close to as possible.

In the last few years, a company (STSturbo) came out that designed a system for rear mounted turbos, that seems to work well.

What I am ultimately trying to figure out is the most efficient way of turbocharging a gasoline engine.

I came up with this idea.

Normal pulse matched headers, going into a y exhaust setup (say 3 1/2") running to the back of the car, mking a u turn, then up to the front, where the turbo is mounted sideways (So the compressor inlet faces grille)

Now plumb compressor straight into intercooler.

Dump turbine exhaust behind front tire.

Compressor inlet has filter on it poking into grille.

REASONING.

1. Exhaust temps to turbo would be at atmospheric temp or close to. (Denser, pulse matched and you would not lose velocity, you would gain because of size of piping used?)

2. Turbo would run 2x as cool as a conventional or rear mount.

3. Oiling is easier to plumb.

4. Turbine exhaust has little to no backpressure.

This setup should make more power than either setup. (Traditional or rear mount)

Questions I have are...

1. Must the turbo have the heat element in it to function optimally?

2. Would you need to have a smaller turbine housing with cool air pushing the turbine? or would a larger turbine housing work the same?

3. Out of the 3 setups mentioned which would produce the greater amount of compressed air (boost)

This is more for a personal project than anything. So any insight would be appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
Any chance of some sketches? I'm finding it hard to picture your proposal.
 
The problem with this, and with the STS kits, - and their general reasoning at least in their sales pitch- is that YES, the gas because denser... This does not mean it has more energy or capability to drive a turbine.

I don't want to go too crazy, but both pressure and temperature contribute to the energy content of a gas. The point of a turbine, is to pull that energy out of a gas and turn it into usable mechanical work, in this case to turn a compressor. Their logic is fundamentally flawed in that cooling the gasses does NOT drive the compressor better, in fact you are LOOSING energy which can be harnessed to do work, in the form of lost thermal energy. This is accompanied by a drop in pressure. Overall, this drop in energy hurts the maximum amount of energy available for the turbocharger. Now, here is where they get away with it: Turbocharger systems operate with a wastegate, which routes exhaust gasses around the turbine, because they are sized such that the available energy is more then what is required by the compressor to achieve a requested boost level. So, all that *really* gets hurt is the spool up time / lag, and they combat this by using smaller, more restrictive housings, which hurts overall system flow and thus power.

It works ok, for a budget system. Their marketing is very decieving and well, pretty much incorrect, but a lot of people believe it anyways. I would definantly NOT take this system to the extreme by doubleing the distance to the turbocharger, in fact if one wanted to improve uppon the STS systems the first place I would start is with major insulation of the exhaust system on the way to the turbocharger in order to keep this energy in the system.

FYI, on higher horsepower setups (I build turbo honda's and vw's in my spare time) we often see 30-50psi gauge pressure in the exhaust manifold before the turbocharger, at tempuratures up to 1700 degrees F... Drop that temperature down to near ambient, and the pressure decrease this will come with, your going to have one VERY poor running turbocharger.
 
YOU WANT A VERY SHORT PIPE TO THE TURBO AS BIG AS POSSABLE
study race car turbos they do it that way BECAUSE IT WORKS
yes turbo's get HOT , cold gas has little energy = low power

remember the big trade off in turbo's is drivability
too slow a responce [called spool] makes a poor driving car

I own and drive two turbo cars a gas volvo and a diesel M-B
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top