Gauge conditions concerning vector potential and potential

Lindsayyyy
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone

Homework Statement



Give is a generall gauge transformation \Phi \rightarrow \Phi ' =\Phi -\frac {\partial \chi}{\partial t}
and
\vec A \rightarrow \vec A' = \vec A + \nabla \chi

first task for now is the following: How do I have to choose Chi in order to fulfill the lorenz gauge condition.

Homework Equations


{\rm div} \vec A + \frac{1}{c^2} \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\phi = 0


The Attempt at a Solution


FIrst of all I'm not even sure if I have to discuss phi and A as if they are linked to each other or not. But let's take a look at my A

I tried to use the divergence on my A'

div \vec A' = div \vec A + div \nabla \chi then I use the Lorenz gauge condition for div a and I finally get

\nabla ^2 \chi +\mu_0 \epsilon_0 \frac {\partial^2 \chi}{\partial t^2}=0

Is this the right approach ? I'm stuck here though I don't know how I have to choose my chi now and I still haven't taken a look at my potential.

Thanks for your help in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's correct. Lorenz gauge implies that the parameter is a solution of the free wave equation.
 
thanks for the quick reply. Do I have to do something else with my potential phi or is the task done with that?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top