Gauge Invariance of Weak Gravity Approximation

Dixanadu
Messages
250
Reaction score
2
Hey guys,

So I have a question about the gauge invariance of the weak field approximation. So if I write the approximation as

\Box h^{\mu\nu} -\partial_{\alpha}(\partial^{\mu}h^{\nu\alpha}+\partial^{\nu}h^{\mu\alpha})+\partial^{\mu}\partial^{\nu}h=0

then this is invariant under the gauge transformation

\delta h^{\mu\nu}=\partial^{\mu}\epsilon^{\nu}+\partial^{\nu}\epsilon^{\mu}+\mathcal{O}(\epsilon, h)

if you ignore the correction terms. So my question is...how does this variation come about? I mean how would I calculate this variation from first principles, using g^{\mu\nu}(x)=\eta^{\mu\nu}+h^{\mu\nu}(x)?

I looked at wikipedia and I didnt understand a word...so can someone please offer a simplified explanation of how to achieve this expression?

Thanks guys!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
Back
Top