countable
- 12
- 0
Hi,
Hope some one can help me with a problem I am working on:
It involves working out:
[tex]\frac{\delta L}{\delta A_\nu}[/tex] of the following Lagrangian:
[tex]L=\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu} + \frac{1}{2}<br /> (D_{\mu} \Psi)^{*} D^{\mu}\Psi[/tex]
The solutions show that this is equal to:
[tex]\frac{\delta L}{\delta A^\nu}=\frac{1}{2}(iq\psi^*D^\nu\psi - iq\psi D^\nu\phi^* )[/tex] (1)
[I'm guessing the phi above is just a typo - should it be psi?]
Would I be right in saying that:
[tex](D_{\mu}\Psi)^{*}=\partial_\mu \psi^* + iqA_\mu \psi^*[/tex] - is this how to deal with complex conjugation? (where [tex]D_\mu = \partial_\mu - iqA_\mu[/tex] - ie. the covariant derivative)
If this is correct,
[tex] \frac{\delta }{\delta A_\nu} (D_{\mu} \Psi)^{*} D^{\mu}\Psi=\frac{\delta }{\delta A_\nu}(\partial_\mu \psi^* + iqA_\mu \psi^*)(\partial^\mu \psi - iqA^\mu \psi)[/tex]
isn't this simply:
[tex]iq \psi^*(\partial^\mu \psi - iqA^\mu \psi) = iq \psi^* D^\mu \psi[/tex]
So where does the second term in (1) come from?
Also does it make sense to differentiate tensors of different types ie:
[tex]A^\mu[/tex] wrt [tex]A_\mu[/tex]
Hope some one can help me with a problem I am working on:
It involves working out:
[tex]\frac{\delta L}{\delta A_\nu}[/tex] of the following Lagrangian:
[tex]L=\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu} + \frac{1}{2}<br /> (D_{\mu} \Psi)^{*} D^{\mu}\Psi[/tex]
The solutions show that this is equal to:
[tex]\frac{\delta L}{\delta A^\nu}=\frac{1}{2}(iq\psi^*D^\nu\psi - iq\psi D^\nu\phi^* )[/tex] (1)
[I'm guessing the phi above is just a typo - should it be psi?]
Homework Equations
andThe Attempt at a Solution
Would I be right in saying that:
[tex](D_{\mu}\Psi)^{*}=\partial_\mu \psi^* + iqA_\mu \psi^*[/tex] - is this how to deal with complex conjugation? (where [tex]D_\mu = \partial_\mu - iqA_\mu[/tex] - ie. the covariant derivative)
If this is correct,
[tex] \frac{\delta }{\delta A_\nu} (D_{\mu} \Psi)^{*} D^{\mu}\Psi=\frac{\delta }{\delta A_\nu}(\partial_\mu \psi^* + iqA_\mu \psi^*)(\partial^\mu \psi - iqA^\mu \psi)[/tex]
isn't this simply:
[tex]iq \psi^*(\partial^\mu \psi - iqA^\mu \psi) = iq \psi^* D^\mu \psi[/tex]
So where does the second term in (1) come from?
Also does it make sense to differentiate tensors of different types ie:
[tex]A^\mu[/tex] wrt [tex]A_\mu[/tex]