Gauss Divergence Theorem - Silly doubt - Almost solved

come2ershad
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem statement has been attached with this post.

Homework Equations



I considered u = ux i + uy j and unit normal n = nx i + ny j.


The Attempt at a Solution



I used gauss' divergence theorem. Then it came as integral [(dux/dx) d(omega)] + integral [(duy/dy) d(omega)] = integral [(ux nx d(gamma)] + integral [(uy ny d(gamma)]

My question is can I separate the x and y components and write as separate equations as given in the problem? Is that right?
 

Attachments

  • db.jpg
    db.jpg
    23.2 KB · Views: 466
Physics news on Phys.org
anybody?
 
You can, although it is not trivial to prove it. Break up the boundary so that the components of the vector can be written as functions of x on each piece and use x itself as parameter. That will give the first equation.

Then break up the boundary so the components of the vector can be written as functions of y on each piece and use y itself as parameter. That will give the second equation.

That partitioning is used in the proof of the theorem. You might want to look at the proof in any Calculus text.
 
Thanks for the reply.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top