Gauss' Law Application Question

AI Thread Summary
A linear charge of λ = 10^-11 C/m is uniformly distributed along a thin nonconductive rod of length L = 0.5 m. To calculate the electric field at a distance of r = 0.1 m from the rod using Gauss' Law, the Gaussian surface is chosen as a cylinder perpendicular to the rod. The equation derived is E_x.2πx_0.dz = λdz/ε_0, where it is noted that the length of the rod can be ignored due to symmetry. Ultimately, the electric field is determined to be E = λ/(2πrε_0), confirming that the length does not affect the result. This approach effectively utilizes Gauss' Law for line charges.
Pyroadept
Messages
82
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A linear charge lambda = 10^-11 C/m is uniformly distributed along a thin nonconductive rod of length L = 0.5 m.
Use Gauss' Law to calculate the field at a distance of r = 0.1 m from the charged rod.


Homework Equations


E.da = Q/ε_0

The Attempt at a Solution



Hi everyone,

Firstly, I assumed the rod was a line charge (as opposed to a cylinder, as it's so thin, yes?).

Then I rewrote Gauss' Law as: E_x.2πx_0.dz, where x_0 = 0.1 (... I chose a cylinder perpendicular to the rod as my Gaussian surface)
and the right-hand side as: λdz/ε_0
And so: E_x = λ/2πx_0ε_0

But I don't think this can be correct, as I haven't taken the length of the rod into account.
Can anyone please point me in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I understand that the radial distance from the rod is .1m. I suppose that they want the field somewhere toward he middle so that you may presume that the field lines are ⊥ still to the surface? If there is no particular location along the rod they want, then I'd say you can ignore the length through symmetry and use the charge per unit length in your answer.
 
It looks like you're doing it right. Length shouldn't matter in the problem. In your equation: E_x.2πx_0.dz = λdz/ε_0, your boundaries of integration should be 0 to the length of the Gaussian surface, L. You'll end up with E2πrL = λL/ε_0. Clearly, the L cancels out on both sides. Solving for E, E = λ/(2πrε_0)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top