What is the charge on the outer surface of the middle conductor?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the charge on the outer surface of the middle conductor in a system of three concentric hollow spherical conductors. The inner conductor has charge Q, the middle conductor has charge -2Q, and the outer conductor has charge -Q. It is clarified that the inner surface of the middle conductor carries -Q, leading to the conclusion that the outer surface must carry -Q as well, due to the total charge of the middle conductor being -2Q. The key point is that the charge on the outer surface does not affect the electric field within the conductor, which must remain zero. The final consensus is that the charge on the outer surface of the middle conductor is indeed -Q.
PhysicsInNJ
Messages
44
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Three concentric hollow spherical conductors are charged as follows: the inner conductor carries charge Q, the middle conductor carries charge -2Q, and the outer conductor carries charge -Q. What is the charge on the outer surface of the middle conductor?

Homework Equations


Flux= Qenc / ε0

The Attempt at a Solution



Because the flux inside a conductor has to be zero, I drew a gaussian surface in the second conductor, since the first conductor is carrying Q, the inner surface of the 2nd conductor should carry -Q, and the outer surface, to neutralize that should carry Q.

This is incorrect, and the correct answer is apparently -Q.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PhysicsInNJ said:
drew a gaussian surface in the second conductor, since the first conductor is carrying Q, the inner surface of the 2nd conductor should carry -Q,
Good!

PhysicsInNJ said:
and the outer surface, to neutralize that should carry Q.
The outer surface doesn't have to 'neutralize' anything. Hint: What's the total charge on the second conductor?
 
Doen't the inside of the conductor itself have to have no electric field? and if you have uneven charges there would be a field? And if the total charge of the second conductor is -2Q, and the inner surface is -Q, then they just are additive and the outer surface becomes -Q?
 
PhysicsInNJ said:
Doen't the inside of the conductor itself have to have no electric field?
That's correct: within the conducting material, the electric field is zero.
PhysicsInNJ said:
and if you have uneven charges there would be a field?
Not sure what you mean by "uneven". Realize that the charge on the outer surface of the conductor has no effect on the field within it.
PhysicsInNJ said:
And if the total charge of the second conductor is -2Q, and the inner surface is -Q, then they just are additive and the outer surface becomes -Q?
Correct. That's all there is to it.
 
  • Like
Likes PhysicsInNJ
That was what I was getting caught up in, that the charge on the outside does not effect the field inside. Thank you!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top