Gauss' Law - Planar Symmetry HELP

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying Gauss' Law to calculate the electric field from a charged square plate. For part (a), the electric field near the center of the plate should be calculated using the equation E = (Omega)/(2e), where Omega is the surface charge density, as the distance is small compared to the plate size. In part (b), the plate can be treated as a point charge at a distance of 62 m, using the equation E = [1/(4πe)] [q/r^2]. The confusion arises from incorrectly incorporating distance into the infinite plate scenario, where it is not needed. Understanding the distinction between the two scenarios is crucial for accurate calculations.
yanimated
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A square plate of edge length 9.0 cm and negligible thickness has a total charge of 6.3 x 10-6 C.

(a) Estimate the magnitude E of the electric field just off the center of the plate (at, say, a distance of 0.50 mm) by assuming that the charge is spread uniformly over the two faces of the plate.

(b) Estimate E at a distance of 62 m (large relative to the plate size) by assuming that the plate is a point charge.


Homework Equations



E = magnitude of electric field
Omega = Surface Charge Density
e = 8.85 x 10^-12 C^2/Nm^2
pi = pi (ie 3.14...)
r = radius
q = Charge

E = (Omega)/(2e)

and then I used E = [ 1/(4pie) ] [ q/r^2 ]

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I first used the second equation there with q = 6.3 x 10^-6 C
and r = .5 mm = .0005 m to find the magnitude of the electric field.

And then I plugged what I got there into E = (Omega)/(2e) to find Omega.

That was wrong :(. What am I doing wrong? Is there another equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mmm... (a) is just the case of finding E field for an infiinitely large plate for the distance to plate is small compare to plate size... so r does not comes in at all...besides you had E = (Omega)/(2e), nowhere is there a "r" in here!

(b) as suggested by the hint, treat it as a point charge
 
"just off the center of the plate (at, say, a distance of 0.50 mm)"

So wouldn't the .50mm be the radius? Or am I just still not getting it?
 
IF you consider that the plate is effectively an infinite plate, THEN you use E=(Omega)/2e as suggested by you... and there is no "r" in this equation!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top