Gauss' Law with a Insulating Shell

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at a specific point near a uniformly charged insulating spherical shell with inner radius 4 cm and outer radius 6 cm. Participants express confusion regarding the boundaries of the shell and the appropriate radius to use in calculations. The correct approach involves recognizing that the charge is only present in the shell between the inner and outer radii, leading to the need for a specific formula for charge density. Clarification is provided that the volume of the shell must be used to determine the enclosed charge correctly. The thread emphasizes the importance of showing work explicitly for better assistance in solving the problem.
PenDraconis
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


pic.gif
An insulator in the shape of a spherical shell is shown in cross-section above. The insulator is defined by an inner radius a = 4 cm and an outer radius b = 6 cm and carries a total charge of Q = + 9 μC(You may assume that the charge is distributed uniformly throughout the volume of the insulator).

What is Ey, the y-component of the electric field at point P which is located at (x,y) = (0, -5 cm) as shown in the diagram?

Homework Equations


$$E\oint dA = \frac{Q_{enclosed}}{\epsilon_0}$$


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm confused on where the boundries of the shell lie, is it between the end of a and the end of b (thus making the shell have a width of b-a)?

If it IS the above, then we'd have to do analyze the problem with a Gaussian surface that ends at point P, located between the two.

We already know:
$$\rho = \frac{+Q}{\frac{4}{3}\pi r^3}$$​

$$E\oint dA = \frac{Q_{enclosed}}{\epsilon_0}$$​
$$EA = \frac{Q_{enclosed}}{\epsilon_0}$$​
$$E(4\pi r^2) = \frac{Q_{enclosed}}{\epsilon_0}$$​
$$E(4\pi r^2) = \frac{\rho \frac{4}{3}\pi r^3}{\epsilon_0}$$​
$$E = \frac{\rho r}{3\epsilon_0}$$​

However, when I attempt to use the above expression, I'm not getting a correct answer. What am I doing incorrectly, I'm definitely confused on what "r" should I be using (i.e. is "r" the .05 m given to us in the problem or is, for some reason, the sphere with radius P minus the sphere with a radius of a)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PenDraconis said:
I'm confused on where the boundries of the shell lie, is it between the end of a and the end of b (thus making the shell have a width of b-a)?
Right.

We already know:
$$\rho = \frac{+Q}{\frac{4}{3}\pi r^3}$$​
That is an equation for a uniform sphere, not for a spherical shell.
What is the volume of the spherical shell?

You'll need another volume of a (different) spherical shell for the electric field afterwards.
 
Thank you!

I understood my error basically as soon as I wrote out the question despite struggling for a while.

For anyone else with a similar problem looking at this, basically there's only charge in the "shell" between b and a. So to find the charge density you'd have to do the equation for a shell with radius b and subtract from that the shell with radius a, basically netting you with:

$$\rho = \frac{Q}{\frac{4}{3}\pi (b^3-a^3)}$$​
 
I keep on getting the density correct, but the Qenclosed incorrect whe tryign to solve this problem.I think I am going wrong with the radius or something
 
shaniespins said:
I keep on getting the density correct, but the Qenclosed incorrect whe tryign to solve this problem.I think I am going wrong with the radius or something
Welcome to PF.

This is a 10 year old thread, but we can still try to help you with your question about the problem. You will need to show your work explicitly before we can help you, preferably posting your math using LaTeX. I will send you a Private Message (PM) with tips on how to use LaTeX (also see the "LaTeX Guide" link below the edit window).
 
  • Like
Likes shaniespins and PhDeezNutz
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top