General Chemistry - gibbs free energy

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the Gibbs free energy change (\Delta G^{\circ}) for the reaction Pb(s) + 2H^{+}(aq) → Pb^{2+}(aq) + H_2(g) with a cell potential (E^{\circ}) of +0.126 V, the equation \Delta G^{\circ} = -nFE^{\circ} is used. Here, n represents the number of moles of electrons transferred, and F is Faraday's constant (96485 J/V·mol). The calculation shows that \Delta G^{\circ} equals -24 kJ/mol, confirming option (a) as the correct answer. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between cell potential and Gibbs free energy in electrochemistry. Overall, the approach and calculations presented are accurate and validated by participants in the discussion.
FrogPad
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
I don't know where to start with this problem. I must be missing an equation or something...

Q: Pb(s)+2H^{+}(aq)\rightarrow Pb^{2+}(aq)+H_2(g) \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,E^{\degree}_{cell}=+0.126V

What is the \Delta G^{\degree} in \frac{kJ}{mol} for this reaction.

a) -24
b) 24
c) -12
d) 12
e) 50

a shove in the right direction would be awesome
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FrogPad, you are missing the equation, which relates the potential of a cell to the change in Gibbs free energy. Try searching your text again.
 
Woops I think I missed reading like 3 pages out of the chapter :)

So, does this look ok?
\Delta G^\circ = -nFE^\circ

Pb(s)+2H^{+}(aq)\rightarrow Pb^{2+}(aq)+H_2(g)\,\,\,\,E^\circ = 0.126

Pb(s)\rightarrow Pb^{2+}(aq)=2e^{-} \,\,\,\,E^{\circ}=-0.126
2H^{+}(aq)+2e^{-} \righarrow H_2 (g) \,\,\,\,E^\circ = 0
\Delta G^\circ = -nFE^\circ = -2\left( \frac{96485 J}{Vmol}\right) (0.126V)=-243142\frac{J}{mol}=-24\frac{kJ}{mol}
 
Last edited:
Yes, it looks fine.
 
Thanks man. :)

I appreciate it!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top