General electronic configuration of the d and f block elements

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the correct electron configuration notation for elements in periods 6 and 7, specifically debating whether it should be represented as (n-1)d^{1->10}ns^2 or (n-1)d^{1->10}ns^{0->2}. The textbook suggests the latter, but there is a belief that the former is more accurate due to the presence of f-orbitals in these periods. Additionally, there is a question about the f-block elements' configuration, with a preference for (n-2)f^{1->14}ns^2 over (n-2)f^{1->14}(n-1)d^{0->1}ns^2, as it aligns with the order of electron addition. The discussion references the Madelung rule for potential exceptions in these configurations. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexity of electron configurations in relation to the Aufbau principle.
Kaushik
Messages
282
Reaction score
17
Is it ##(n-1)d^{1->10}ns^2 \ or \ (n-1)d^{1->10}ns^{0->2}## ? My textbook says it is the latter. But I feel like it should be the former. Moreover, period 6 and 7 has the presence of f-orbitals. So adding## (n-2)f^{0->14}## would make it more general. Isn't it?

And also what about the f-block elements? Is it ##(n-2)f^{1->14}ns^2 \ or \ (n-2)f^{1->14}(n-1)d^{0->1}ns^2## ? I feel like it should be the former as the electrons are being added to (n-2) f before (n-1) d. I doubt the second one is correct unless there are any exceptions. But it is just my perception.
Please correct me if I am wrong :)
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top