General equation for the speed of sound?

AI Thread Summary
The general equation for the speed of sound is expressed as c^2 = ∂p/∂ρ, where p represents pressure and ρ denotes density. The discussion highlights the challenge of deriving this equation for a general equation of state, as most available derivations focus on specific cases like gases and solids. It is suggested that classical mechanics can be used for this derivation, with the equation of state being p = p(ρ, s). The partial derivative ∂p/∂ρ is noted to have units of velocity squared, indicating its relation to sonic velocity. The conversation seeks clarity on why this velocity specifically corresponds to the speed of sound.
fhqwgads2005
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I've seen stated in many a physics book that the general case for the speed of sound (for general equations of state p(ρ) ) is given by

c^2 = \frac{\partial p}{\partial \rho}

where p is pressure and ρ is density.

but I can't for the life of me figure out how on Earth to derive that. I've seen tons of derivations for specific cases--gasses, solids, but not for the general case. According to wikipedia, it can be derived using classical mechanics. Can someone point me in the right direction?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
c = \sqrt{P/\rho}

Where P = coefficient of "stiffness"
and \rho = density
 
oops sorry. Didn't understand your initial question. I just jumped to conclusions.
 
the equation of state is p=p(ρ,s) thus

dp = (\frac{∂p}{∂\rho})_{s}d\rho + (\frac{∂p}{∂s})_{\rho} ds

I am guessing that because (\frac{∂p}{∂\rho})_{s} has units of "velocity squared", it is looked upon as such;
But why this velocity is the sonic one - beats me...

Anyone?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top