(General question)Area charge density and electric potential

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential of a uniformly charged spherical shell using two methods. The first approach, applying Gauss's Law, yields the expected result of V = Q/(4πε₀R) for the potential outside the shell. However, an alternative method leads to an unexpected result of V = Q/(2πε₀R), raising confusion about the integration limits and the charge distribution. Clarification is sought regarding the integration process and the thickness of the shell, emphasizing the need to accurately account for the charge's location. Ultimately, the correct potential for a thin spherical shell is confirmed as V = Q/(4πε₀R).
prodo123
Messages
17
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Sorry, the post isn't about a single homework problem but rather something that I keep getting confused on. It's about calculating the electric potential of a spherical shell of uniform charge in two different ways.

Homework Equations


##\Delta V=\int_a^b -\vec E\cdot d\vec r##
##V=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int\frac{dq}{r}##
Gauss's Law

The Attempt at a Solution


Taking ##V=0## at ##r\to\infty##, the electric potential of a spherical shell of charge ##Q## with radius ##R## should be:

##V=\int^R_\infty -\vec E\cdot d\vec r##

Using Gauss's Law, the electric field outside the shell is ##\vec E = \frac{Q}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r^2}\hat r##. This gives ##V=\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0}(\frac{1}{R}-\frac{1}{\infty})=\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0 R}##, which is what we expect.
The charge area density for the shell is ##\sigma=\frac{Q}{4\pi R^2}=\frac{q}{A}##. Having A be the surface area for a sphere, the function for the charge of a spherical shell of radius r is:

##q(r)=\sigma A = \frac{Q}{4\pi R^2}(4\pi r^2)=Q\frac{r^2}{R^2}##

The infinitesimal charge is therefore ##dq=\frac{2Q}{R^2}r dr##.

Since electric potentials for a distribution of charge is found by ##V=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int\frac{dq}{r}##, the ##r## variables cancel out and the integral reduces to ##V=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int^R_0\frac{2Q}{R^2}dr##.

Evaluating the integral gives ##V=\frac{Q}{2\pi\epsilon_0 R}##, which is not what's expected. There's a factor of 2 somewhere that's throwing off the answers. Where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
prodo123 said:
a spherical shell of uniform charge
How thick is the shell ? You integrate from 0 to R but is that really where the charge resides ?
 
BvU said:
How thick is the shell ? You integrate from 0 to R but is that really where the charge resides ?
##A_{\text{sphere}}=R^2\iint sin(\theta)d\theta d\phi## where ##\pi \ge \theta \ge 0## and ##2\pi\ge\phi\ge 0## for an infinitely thin spherical shell
Leaving ##\phi## as a variable gives the following:
##A=2R^2\int d\phi##
##dA = 2R^2 d\phi##
##q=\sigma A##
##dq = \sigma dA = 2\sigma R^2 d\phi##
##V=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int^{2\pi} _0 (\frac{1}{R})2\sigma R^2 d\phi##
##V=\frac{\sigma R}{\epsilon_0} = \frac{\frac{Q}{4\pi R^2}R}{\epsilon_0}##
##V=\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0 R}##
Right...thanks!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top