General solution to the circuits

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a general formula for a circuit with resistors R1, R3, and R5 in increasing magnitude, while R2 remains constant. It is suggested that the equivalent resistance of the ladder network can be determined by considering R2 in parallel with the remaining resistors extending to infinity. The resistance measured between points A and B will be bounded by R2 and the square root of the sum of R2 squared and R1 squared. Additionally, the resistance measured at points C and D will be constrained by Rn and R2,n. The conversation raises questions about the concept of infinity in this context.
killingb
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
assuming that the circuit will lead to infinite, but converging, and R1,R3,R5 are in increasing magnitude, R2 is constant, is there a general formula for this problem?
 

Attachments

  • 5.JPG
    5.JPG
    25 KB · Views: 417
Engineering news on Phys.org
Not that I could help you with your question anyhow, but it might be a good idea for you to re-post your diagram. I can't even see the lettering on it.
 
The equivalent resistance of the ladder network is R_2 in parallel with the rest of the ladder (from R_1 to infinity).
If I understood it well, R_2 is the solution. For the resistance of a parallel connection to be equal to one of the resistances, the other one must be infinity.
 
My apologies, killingb... I didn't realize until now that the picture was enlargeable after opening. :redface:
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure what the question is.

If you lable the left input as A B and the right output as C D.

Then the measured resistance A B will never be greater than R_2,1 or less than sqrt(R_2,1^2 + R_1^2).
The measured resistance at C D will never be > R_n + R_2,n or < R_n.
The measured current through R_2,n will approach 0.

Where does the infinity come from?
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...

Similar threads

Back
Top