General thermo questions [Thermal average occupancy]

IHateMayonnaise
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
Howdy,

Just studying for a test, need to clear something up and I can't find it in any of my books.

My question is in regards to N, which to me seems like it is the same as <N> also known as the thermal average occupancy. This quantity represents the thermal average number of the orbitals in the system while in thermal and diffusive contact with a reservoir. In such a domain, we want to use the grand partition function:

z=\sum_{ASN}e^{-\beta(N\mu-\varepsilon_s)}=\sum_{ASN}\lambda^Ne^{(-\beta\varepsilon_s)}

where
\beta=\frac{1}{K_bT}, \lambda=e^{\beta\mu}

And the following definitions for <N>:

<N>=\frac{1}{z}\sum_{ASN}Ne^{-\beta(N\mu-\varepsilon_s)}

and

<N>=\lambda\sum_{S}e^{-\beta\varepsilon_s}

My question: What is the connection between the last two equations for <N>? Thanks yall

IHateMayonnaise
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two ways of getting ensemble averages: you can either take an average weighted by the coefficients in the partition function


Say, if

Z = \sum_{\mathrm{states}} \rho, \hspace{0.5cm} \mathrm{then} \hspace{0.5cm} \langle N \rangle = \frac{1}{Z} \sum_{\mathrm{states}} N \rho.

The second way that I know of to calculate averages is to derivate the thermodynamic potential twice. Your second formula looks like it might be something of the sort, but I'm really not very sure.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top