Generating/spanning modules and submodules .... .... Blyth Theorem 2.3

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modules Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof of Theorem 2.3 from T. S. Blyth's "Module Theory: An Approach to Linear Algebra," specifically regarding the definition of linear combinations in the context of modules. The theorem states that a linear combination of elements from the union of submodules is represented as a sum of the form $$\sum_{j \in J} m_j$$, while the user questions whether it should instead include scalar multipliers, represented as $$\sum_{j \in J} \lambda_j m_j$$. The clarification provided indicates that while the linear combination can include scalars, the set $S$ referenced in the theorem is not a module, which is crucial for understanding the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of module theory and its definitions
  • Familiarity with linear combinations in algebra
  • Knowledge of Blyth's "Module Theory: An Approach to Linear Algebra"
  • Basic concepts of submodules and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definitions and properties of linear combinations in module theory
  • Review the proof of Theorem 2.3 in Blyth's text for deeper insights
  • Explore the implications of scalar multiplication in module theory
  • Investigate the characteristics of sets that qualify as modules
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone studying module theory who seeks to understand the nuances of linear combinations and their applications in the context of Blyth's work.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading T. S. Blyth's book: Module Theory: An Approach to Linear Algebra ...

I am focused on Chapter 2: Submodules; intersections and sums ... and need help with the proof of Theorem 2.3 ...

Theorem 2.3 reads as follows:View attachment 8157In the above proof we read the following:

" ... ... A linear combination of elements of $$\bigcup_{ i \in I }$$ is precisely a sum of the form $$\sum_{ j \in J } m_j$$ for some $$J \in P(I).$$ ... ... "But ... Blyth defines a linear combination as in the text below ...https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/8158So ... given the above definition wouldn't a linear combination of elements of $$\bigcup_{ i \in I } M_i$$ be a sum of the form $$\sum_{ j \in J } \lambda_j m_j$$ ... and not just $$\sum_{ j \in J } m_j$$ ... ... ?
Hope someone can help ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: if $m \in M$ and $M$ is a module, then also $\lambda m \in M$, for $\lambda \in R$.

Thus $\Sigma_{j \in J} \lambda_j m'_j = \Sigma_{j \in J} m_j $ for $m_j = \lambda_j m'_j \in M_j$

However, the set $S$ used above, is not a module ...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K